Guidelines for Development of an Audio Codec within the IETF
RFC 6569

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
08 (System) Notify list changed from codec-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-codec-guidelines@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
08 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2012-03-28
08 (System) RFC published
2012-03-16
08 Martin Thomson Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Martin Thomson.
2012-01-17
08 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2012-01-17
08 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2012-01-13
08 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2012-01-13
08 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2012-01-13
08 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-01-13
08 Cindy Morgan Approval announcement text regenerated
2012-01-12
08 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Martin Thomson
2012-01-12
08 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Martin Thomson
2012-01-10
08 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-01-10
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-guidelines-08.txt
2012-01-09
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-guidelines-07.txt
2011-12-04
08 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Tom Yu.
2011-12-01
08 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-12-01
08 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation.
2011-12-01
08 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
The Abstract section speaks about 'developing and specifying a codec within the IETF', then the Introduction speaks about 'standardization of a codec that ...
2011-12-01
08 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-12-01
08 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
The WG charter says quite a lot about liaising its work with other SDOs. Although this I-D may be a bit foundational, it ...
2011-12-01
08 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-12-01
08 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-12-01
08 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
Section 6 would be much improved if bullet item 2 (IETF's own codec) stated that such codecs MUST be entirely separate in terms ...
2011-12-01
08 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-30
08 Martin Thomson Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Martin Thomson.
2011-11-29
08 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
- I tend to agree with Stephen's comment that this document really is about an audio codec and it should say that. But ...
2011-11-29
08 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-29
08 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-29
08 Russ Housley [Ballot comment]
Please consider the comments in the Gen-ART Review by Martin Thomson
  on 11-Oct-2011.  The comment are here:

  http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg06791.html
2011-11-29
08 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-29
08 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
So I'm not sure you need to do this, but a lot of times WG's develop requirements drafts and then they fret over ...
2011-11-29
08 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-28
08 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- I'm wondering if this is really only about audio - the title implies
its more general but the body of the document ...
2011-11-28
08 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-28
08 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
Although I strongly support this work, I am recusing myself because I co-authored the first several versions of draft-valin-codec-guidelines, which was used as ...
2011-11-28
08 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded
2011-11-28
08 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
Nit

S/agains them/against them/
2011-11-28
08 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-23
08 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-17
08 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Martin Thomson
2011-11-17
08 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Martin Thomson
2011-11-08
08 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Tom Yu
2011-11-08
08 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Tom Yu
2011-11-02
08 Robert Sparks Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-12-01
2011-11-02
08 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2011-11-02
08 Robert Sparks Ballot has been issued
2011-11-02
08 Robert Sparks Created "Approve" ballot
2011-11-02
08 Robert Sparks State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup.
2011-10-31
08 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-10-31
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-guidelines-06.txt
2011-10-28
08 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Tom Yu.
2011-10-28
08 Robert Sparks State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-10-19
08 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-10-14
08 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.
2011-10-10
08 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tom Yu
2011-10-10
08 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tom Yu
2011-10-05
08 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-10-05
08 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2011-10-05
08 Robert Sparks Last Call was requested
2011-10-05
08 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-10-05
08 (System) Last call text was added
2011-10-05
08 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-10-05
08 Robert Sparks State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-10-05
08 Robert Sparks Last Call text changed
2011-10-05
08 Robert Sparks Ballot writeup text changed
2011-10-02
08 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-10-02
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-guidelines-05.txt
2011-09-29
08 Robert Sparks State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation::External Party.
2011-09-01
08 Robert Sparks State changed to AD Evaluation::External Party from AD Evaluation.
2011-08-31
08 Robert Sparks State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-08-22
08 Cindy Morgan
>  (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
>        Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
>  ...
2011-08-22
08 Cindy Morgan Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-08-22
08 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Jonathan Rosenberg (jdrosen@jdrosen.net) is the Document Shepherd' added
2011-08-03
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-guidelines-04.txt
2011-07-29
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-guidelines-03.txt
2011-07-06
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-guidelines-02.txt
2011-06-13
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-guidelines-01.txt
2011-01-22
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-codec-guidelines-00.txt