Transport of Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID) Messages over HTTP/TLS
Draft of message to be sent after approval:
From: The IESG <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: IETF-Announce <email@example.com> Cc: RFC Editor <firstname.lastname@example.org>, mile mailing list <email@example.com>, mile chair <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Protocol Action: 'Transport of Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID) Messages over HTTP/ TLS' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-09.txt) The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Transport of Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID) Messages over HTTP/ TLS' (draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-09.txt) as a Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Sean Turner and Stephen Farrell. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis/
Technical Summary This document provides the HTTP/TLS transport specification for Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID) messaging defined in RFC6045-bis. This document updates RFC6046. Working Group Summary The working group formally adopted this draft as a working group item in Taipei. There has been clear recognition that this document is needed to provide the transport for RFC6045-bis (also a WG item). Working group members showed their support for this document in the review process through reviews and comments sent to the mailing list. All suggested changes are included in the current version. Document Quality There are existing implementations and new ones in development based on the updated requirements. Increasing interest in this protocol has been demonstrated by computer security incident response teams (CSIRTs) and information sharing groups (industry and regionally focused) to automate the exchange of cyber security information exchange. The ITU-T also has interest in referencing this document in their suite of protocols in Study Group 17, question 4. Small changes were recommended and made during the working group last call. There are no outstanding technical concerns with this document. The technical reviews provided by David Black and SM@resistor.net provided small changes that are reflected in the current version. Personnel Kathleen Moriarty (email@example.com) is the document shepherd. Sean Turner (firstname.lastname@example.org) is the responsible Area Director.