IPv6 Support Required for All IP-Capable Nodes
RFC 6540

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2017-05-16
02 (System) Changed document authors from "Lee Howard, Chris Donley, Wesley George" to "Lee Howard, Chris Donley, Wesley George, Christopher Liljenstolpe"
2015-10-14
02 (System) Notify list changed from intarea-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
02 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for David Harrington
2012-08-22
02 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ronald Bonica
2012-04-13
02 (System) RFC published
2012-01-17
02 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2012-01-13
02 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2012-01-13
02 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2012-01-13
02 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2012-01-13
02 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-01-13
02 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2012-01-13
02 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2012-01-13
02 Jari Arkko State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2012-01-12
02 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ron Bonica has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-01-11
02 Jari Arkko Document placed on today's informal IESG telechat to try to clear the remaining issues.
2011-12-14
02 David Harrington [Ballot comment]
I cleared
2011-12-14
02 David Harrington [Ballot discuss]
2011-12-14
02 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Harrington has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2011-12-08
02 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-12-08
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-02.txt
2011-10-11
02 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
1) This document uses RFC2119 keywords in a way that I think violates the spirit, if not the requirements, of RFC2119. I think ...
2011-10-07
02 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Ondřej Surý.
2011-09-08
02 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-09-08
02 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-09-08
02 David Harrington
[Ballot comment]
My real concern is that publishing this document a Proposed Standard  RFC might actually be damaging.

IPv4 is being exhausted, and will no ...
2011-09-08
02 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
1) This document uses RFC2119 keywords in a way that I think violates the spirit, if not the requirements, of RFC2119. I think ...
2011-09-07
02 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-09-07
02 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
1. I support Ron's DISCUSS.

2. I do not understand why this document aims to be a Proposed Standard. There are no testable ...
2011-09-07
02 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-07
02 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-07
02 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
I think this would make a wonderful "letter to the editor" opinion piece. I would love to ballot "Yes" on this document,m because ...
2011-09-07
02 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-07
02 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-06
02 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot comment]
Section 2 says "IP is redefined to mean IPv4 + IPv6", but I think to be consistent with the rest of the document ...
2011-09-06
02 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-09-06
02 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-09-05
02 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
I am not sure what this document adds to the RFC series. Before this document was written, if an implementation didn't support IPv6, ...
2011-09-05
02 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-05
02 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-04
02 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I think I am missing the point of this document. It is not that I
disagree with it, but I don't see what ...
2011-09-04
02 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-04
02 Pete Resnick [Ballot comment]
I see nothing harmful about this document, but I also don't see that it will have any real-world impact.
2011-09-04
02 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-03
02 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
I support the document and it's intent, but would ask the authors to think about the following:

These two statements seem contradictory:

  ...
2011-09-03
02 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-02
02 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-02
02 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-08-31
02 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-08-29
02 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.
2011-08-26
02 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Ondřej Surý
2011-08-26
02 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Ondřej Surý
2011-08-19
02 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2011-08-19
02 Cindy Morgan
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2011-08-19
02 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-09-08
2011-08-19
02 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2011-08-19
02 Jari Arkko Ballot has been issued
2011-08-19
02 Jari Arkko Created "Approve" ballot
2011-08-19
02 Jari Arkko Last Call was requested
2011-08-19
02 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-08-19
02 (System) Last call text was added
2011-08-19
02 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-08-19
02 Jari Arkko State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation.
2011-08-19
02 Jari Arkko Last Call text changed
2011-08-19
02 Jari Arkko
I have reviewed this draft, found it ready to move forward, and sent it to IETF Last Call. Thanks for writing this draft.

I only ...
2011-08-19
02 Jari Arkko State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-07-15
02 Cindy Morgan
  (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
        Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
  ...
2011-07-15
02 Cindy Morgan Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-07-15
02 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Julien Laganier (julien.ietf@gmail.com) is the document shepherd.' added
2011-07-15
02 Julien Laganier sent to secretariat for publication request
2011-07-15
02 Julien Laganier IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from In WG Last Call
2011-07-11
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt
2011-06-23
02 Julien Laganier Short 2.25 pages doc, can go into WGLC now.
2011-06-23
02 Julien Laganier IETF state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document
2011-06-17
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-00.txt