Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Trust Anchor Locator
RFC 6490

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

(Stewart Bryant) Yes

(Sean Turner) (was Discuss) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

Comment (2011-04-13 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
Introductions do not typically contain normative language.

(Ralph Droms) No Objection

Comment (2011-04-12 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
In section 3, s/as deem appropriate/as deemed appropriate/

(Wesley Eddy) No Objection

Comment (2011-04-12 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
I think in section 2.1 "A TA in the RPKI TA" is supposed to be just "A TA in the RPKI".

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

Comment (2011-04-14)
No email
send info
I have no objection to the publication of this document.

Two piddly nits that are worth addressing only if you have the
document open for other reasons...

---

X.509 on the second line of section 2.1 could use a reference.

---

The definition of a TAL that appears in the first paragraph of 2.1 is
great and could be greater if it appeared in Section 1. Actually, I am
not sure that the first 2 to 2.5 paragraphs of section 2.1 don't belong
in section 1. 

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2011-04-11 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
  Please consider the editorial comments from the Gen-ART Review by
  Wassim Haddad on 16-Mar-2011.

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Peter Saint-Andre) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection