The Unicode Code Points and Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA) - Unicode 6.0
RFC 6452

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

(Pete Resnick) Yes

(Peter Saint-Andre) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

Comment (2011-06-08 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
Unicode 6.0 is mentioned in the text body and included in the reference section, but there are no formal references to the document. (Run the nit-checker and you will see what I mean).

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Ralph Droms) No Objection

(Wesley Eddy) No Objection

Comment (2011-06-03 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
typo in section 1: "that where allocated" -> "that were allocated"?

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

Comment (2011-06-07 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
Abstract

I don't know what it means to "specify consensus". Suggest...

OLD
   This document specifies IETF consensus
NEW
   This memo documents IETF consensus
END

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

Comment (2011-06-02 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
s/This imply/This implies/

(David Harrington) No Objection

(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

(Sean Turner) No Objection