Crypto-Agility Requirements for Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS)
RFC 6421

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
07 (System) Notify list changed from radext-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-radext-crypto-agility-requirements@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2011-11-13
07 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-11-12
07 (System) RFC published
2011-09-16
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2011-09-16
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-09-15
07 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-09-15
07 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-09-15
07 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2011-09-15
07 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-09-15
07 Cindy Morgan Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-09-15
07 Cindy Morgan Ballot writeup text changed
2011-09-15
07 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
The Gen-ART Review by Mary Barnes raises quire a few concerns.  It
  deserves a response.  The review can be found at:

  ...
2011-09-15
07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-08-18
07 Dan Romascanu
the following list of GenART issues raised by Mary Barnes need to be addressed:

The following "Minor issues" were not addressed in the -07:

- ...
2011-07-25
07 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-07-25
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-crypto-agility-requirements-07.txt
2011-07-14
07 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-07-14
07 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation.
2011-07-14
07 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-07-14
07 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
(1) You might want to say that RECOMMENDED is the same as SHOULD where
you define conditional compliance.

(2) Its not entirely clear ...
2011-07-14
07 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-07-14
07 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-07-14
07 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
Section 2: r/can selected/can be selected

Section 4.2: maybe add a reference to RFC 5280 in the following:

  it is RECOMMENDED that ...
2011-07-14
07 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-07-13
07 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-07-13
07 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-07-13
07 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-07-12
07 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Harrington has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-07-12
07 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-07-11
07 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
The Gen-ART Review by Mary Barnes raises quire a few concerns.  It
  deserves a response.  The review can be found at:

  ...
2011-07-11
07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-07-11
07 David Harrington [Ballot discuss]
Good document.
This document is loaded with requirements and recommendations.
Shouldn't this be standards track?
2011-07-11
07 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-07-11
07 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-07-08
07 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-07-07
07 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-07-06
07 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Dan Romascanu
2011-07-06
07 Dan Romascanu Ballot has been issued
2011-07-06
07 Dan Romascanu Created "Approve" ballot
2011-07-06
07 Dan Romascanu Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-07-14
2011-07-06
07 Dan Romascanu State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-06-17
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Charlie Kaufman.
2011-06-14
07 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-06-09
07 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.
2011-06-09
07 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.
2011-06-01
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Charlie Kaufman
2011-06-01
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Charlie Kaufman
2011-05-31
07 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-05-31
07 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2011-05-31
07 Dan Romascanu Last Call was requested
2011-05-31
07 Dan Romascanu State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation.
2011-05-31
07 Dan Romascanu Last Call text changed
2011-05-31
07 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-05-31
07 (System) Last call text was added
2011-05-31
07 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-05-31
07 Dan Romascanu State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-05-02
07 Cindy Morgan
(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the document
and, in particular, does he ...
2011-05-02
07 Cindy Morgan Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-05-02
07 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Bernard Aboba (Bernard_Aboba@hotmail.com) is the document shepherd.' added
2011-05-02
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-crypto-agility-requirements-06.txt
2011-04-17
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-crypto-agility-requirements-05.txt
2011-03-13
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-crypto-agility-requirements-04.txt
2011-03-04
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-crypto-agility-requirements-03.txt
2011-03-03
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-crypto-agility-requirements-02.txt
2009-05-23
07 (System) Document has expired
2008-11-19
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-crypto-agility-requirements-01.txt
2008-05-08
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-crypto-agility-requirements-00.txt