Datatracker States and Annotations for the IAB, IRTF, and Independent Submission Streams
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 15 and is now closed.
(Jari Arkko) Yes
Comment (2011-05-26 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
Thanks for writing it. I think the document is in good shape and can move forward. I just had two issues that you may wish to consider: The "IESG Review Completed" annotation seems odd to me. Per tracker history you will be able to see that it went through IESG and other review states. For consistency: you do not have ISE Review Completed or IRSG Review Completed annotations either. Finally, all other annotations are about things that should happen with the document, not about things that have happened. > by the stream managers. In addtion, the IETF Data Tracker should addition
(Ralph Droms) Yes
(Wesley Eddy) Yes
(Russ Housley) Yes
(Pete Resnick) Yes
(Peter Saint-Andre) (was No Objection, Discuss) Yes
(Ron Bonica) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant) (was Discuss) No Objection
There should be a security note stateing that putting April 1st IDs in the tracker would be damaging to their purpose.