Datatracker States and Annotations for the IAB, IRTF, and Independent Submission Streams
RFC 6322

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 15 and is now closed.

(Jari Arkko) Yes

Comment (2011-05-26 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
Thanks for writing it. I think the document is in good shape and can move forward. I just had two issues that you may wish to consider:

The "IESG Review Completed" annotation seems odd to me. Per tracker history you will be able to see that it went through IESG and other review states. For consistency: you do not have ISE Review Completed or IRSG Review Completed annotations either. Finally, all other annotations are about things that should happen with the document, not about things that have happened.

>   by the stream managers.  In addtion, the IETF Data Tracker should


(Ralph Droms) Yes

(Wesley Eddy) Yes

(Russ Housley) Yes

(Pete Resnick) Yes

(Peter Saint-Andre) (was No Objection, Discuss) Yes

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Stewart Bryant) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2011-05-23)
No email
send info
There should be a security note stateing that putting April 1st IDs in the tracker would be damaging to their purpose.

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) (was Discuss) No Objection