Requirements for a Working Group Charter Tool
RFC 6292

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) (was Discuss) Yes

Yes (2011-04-26)
No email
send info

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) (was Discuss) Yes

Yes ()
No email
send info

(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-04-14 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
I support Dan's Discuss about Milestone changes.
The ability to change milestones should be supported by the tool, and the history of those changes should be maintained.

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-04-12 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
Section 3.1: I seem to remember that dashes also cause problems for some tools.  It might be worth adding this to the note.

Sec 3.1: Has the following:

      When moved to this state, a note is sent to the
      Secretariat to send out the external review announcement to the
      appropriate lists.

Are we envisioning a radio dial for "send email to new-work" ad "do not send email to new-work"?  Not sure if we want this automated or not.

Sec 3.2: Do we want to allow the existing WG chairs to submit revised Charters and  call it "Recharter Requested"?

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info