Security Assessment of the Internet Protocol Version 4
RFC 6274

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
07 (System) Notify list changed from opsec-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsec-ip-security@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stewart Bryant
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Adrian Farrel
2011-07-07
07 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-07-05
07 (System) RFC published
2011-04-18
07 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-04-18
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2011-04-18
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-04-18
07 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-04-18
07 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2011-04-18
07 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-04-18
07 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-04-18
07 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2011-04-16
07 Ron Bonica State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation.
2011-04-08
07 Ron Bonica State changed to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation - Defer::AD Followup.
2011-04-08
07 Stewart Bryant [Ballot discuss]
2011-04-08
07 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-04-08
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-ip-security-07.txt
2011-03-28
07 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-25
07 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
I still think the document would benefit greatly from a restructuring to explicitly address goals and threats,
then structure the body to address ...
2011-03-25
07 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-10
07 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
I still think the document would benefit greatly from a restructuring to explicitly address goals and threats,
then structure the body to address ...
2011-03-10
07 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
[Revised discuss, removing issues that have been addressed and adding detail where the email thread indicates I was unclear.]

The intro has been ...
2011-01-26
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-ip-security-06.txt
2011-01-13
07 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
This is an updated discuss based on some exchanges with the author.  Original #ing is retained.

#1) I support Tim's discuss.

#2) addressed ...
2010-12-25
07 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Jari Arkko
2010-12-16
07 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2010-12-16
07 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-12-16
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-ip-security-05.txt
2010-12-03
07 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
The text in 3.5.2.2 on not using UDP c/s does not do justice to systems where performance requirements make this impractical, for example ...
2010-12-02
07 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
This is an updated discuss based on some exchanges with the author.  Original #ing is retained.

#1) I support Tim's discuss.

#2) The ...
2010-12-02
07 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation - Defer::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation - Defer.
2010-12-02
07 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
#1) Section 3.13.2.4: r/shoudl/should

#2) Section 4.1.2.3: r/described in throughout/described throughout
2010-12-02
07 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
#1) I support Tim's discuss.

#2) The 2119 key words paragraph is included in Section 1.1 but there are no requirements in this ...
2010-12-02
07 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2010-12-02
07 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
This document includes a lot of important information, but the utility is undermined by (1) omission of background
information, (2) inconsistent scope, and ...
2010-12-02
07 Tim Polk [Ballot comment]
I support Adrian's discuss regarding the router alert issues.
2010-12-02
07 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
This document includes a lot of important information, but the utility is undermined by (1) omission of background
information, (2) inconsistent scope, (3) ...
2010-12-02
07 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2010-12-02
07 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4.3.4 claims that based on ongoing work, the treatment
of Class E address space (240/4) should be changed in current routers
and ...
2010-12-02
07 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-12-01
07 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
Thank you for writing this helpful document.

Appendix A borders on marketing and seems like a strange thing to include in an RFC. ...
2010-12-01
07 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-01
07 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
The introduction appears to incorrectly uses the term TCP/IP when the author means the Internet Protocol suit.

"This document is the result of ...
2010-12-01
07 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
The text in 3.5.2.2 on not using UDP c/s does not do justice to systems where performance requirements make this impractical, for example ...
2010-12-01
07 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2010-11-19
07 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-11-18
2010-11-16
07 Tim Polk State changed to IESG Evaluation - Defer from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2010-11-15
07 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
After discussion and on the request of the Responsible AD, Ron Bonica, I am converting my COmment to a Discuss.

I am disappointed ...
2010-11-15
07 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to Discuss from No Objection
2010-11-13
07 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I am disappointed that this document doesn't highlight more fully the issues and concerns for security created by the Router Alert option. A ...
2010-11-13
07 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-11-12
07 Ron Bonica Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-11-18 by Ron Bonica
2010-11-12
07 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2010-11-12
07 Ron Bonica Ballot has been issued by Ron Bonica
2010-11-12
07 Ron Bonica Created "Approve" ballot
2010-11-08
07 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-11-01
07 Amanda Baber IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are no IANA
Actions that need completion.
2010-10-29
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Eric Rescorla
2010-10-29
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Eric Rescorla
2010-10-25
07 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2010-10-25
07 Cindy Morgan State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Cindy Morgan
2010-10-25
07 Ron Bonica Last Call was requested by Ron Bonica
2010-10-25
07 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-10-25
07 (System) Last call text was added
2010-10-25
07 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-10-25
07 Ron Bonica State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Ron Bonica
2010-10-22
07 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'The Document Shepherd is Joel Jaeggli (joelja@bogus.com).' added by Amy Vezza
2010-10-22
07 Amy Vezza
1.a

The Document Shepherd is Joel Jaeggli, Opsec WG cochair. The Document
Shepherd has reviewed Draft 03 of draft-ietf-opsec-ip-security and
concluded that the document is ...
2010-10-22
07 Amy Vezza Draft Added by Amy Vezza in state Publication Requested
2010-10-21
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-ip-security-04.txt
2010-10-15
07 (System) Document has expired
2010-04-13
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-ip-security-03.txt
2010-02-20
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-ip-security-02.txt
2009-08-20
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-ip-security-01.txt
2009-01-29
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-ip-security-00.txt