Issues with IP Address Sharing
RFC 6269

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2018-12-20
05 (System)
Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'The completion of IPv4 address allocations from IANA and the Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) is causing ...
2015-10-14
05 (System) Notify list changed from intarea-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Robert Sparks
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ralph Droms
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert
2011-06-29
05 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-06-28
05 (System) RFC published
2011-06-23
05 Julien Laganier Was sent to IESG.
2011-06-23
05 Julien Laganier IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Document
2011-03-29
05 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-03-29
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2011-03-29
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-03-29
05 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-03-29
05 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2011-03-29
05 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-03-29
05 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-03-29
05 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2011-03-29
05 Jari Arkko State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-03-04
05 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-03
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues-05.txt
2011-03-03
05 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-02-22
05 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-02-21
05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-02-21
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues-04.txt
2011-02-17
05 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-02-17
05 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation.
2011-02-17
05 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
Please consider the comments from the Gen-ART Review by
  Francis Dupont on 16-Feb-2011:

  - 5.2.1 page 11: I have a ...
2011-02-17
05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-02-17
05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-02-17
05 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-02-17
05 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
If the
  percentage of end-to-end IPv6 traffic significantly increases, so
  that the volume of IPv4 traffic begins decreasing, then the number ...
2011-02-17
05 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
13.6.  Policing Forwarding Behaviour

  If some form of IPv6 ingress filtering is deployed in the broadband
  network and DS-Lite ...
2011-02-17
05 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-02-16
05 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-02-16
05 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-02-16
05 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
In Figure 1, while reverse DNS is affected (more precisely, broken) by
NAT without address sharing, in my opinion it is affected differently ...
2011-02-16
05 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
I don't understand this sentence:

17.  IPv6 Transition Issues

  [...]

  Shared addresses should be drawn from space designated as such ...
2011-02-16
05 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-02-16
05 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
I'm adding a placeholder discuss to make sure the discussion between the authors and the tsv-dir reviewer terminates and we have a ...
2011-02-16
05 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to Discuss from No Objection
2011-02-15
05 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot comment]
Section 12 on Traceability refers to "the offending activity". Given the principle of innocent until proven guilty, I suggest "a particular activity".
2011-02-15
05 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot comment]
Section 12 on Traceability refers to "the offending activity". Given the principle of guilty until proven innocent, I suggest "a particular activity".
2011-02-15
05 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-02-15
05 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
Please consider the text proposed by Richard Barnes at
<https://www.ietf.org/ibin/c5i?mid=6&rid=49&gid=0&k1=933&k2=55495&tid=1297789532 ...
2011-02-15
05 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
This document calls out to draft-thaler-port-restricted-ip-issues for several important discussions, but that document has not been refreshed since Feb-10, and I'm not ...
2011-02-15
05 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-02-15
05 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
Section 1., paragraph 1:
>    Authority (IANA) were completed on Feburary 3, 2011 [IPv4_Pool].

  Nit: s/Feburary/February/

Section 1., paragraph ...
2011-02-15
05 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-02-14
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2011-02-14
05 Jari Arkko Ballot has been issued
2011-02-14
05 Jari Arkko Created "Approve" ballot
2011-02-10
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues-03.txt
2011-02-08
05 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-02-17
2011-02-08
05 Jari Arkko State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-02-02
05 David Harrington Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR Completed. Reviewer: Joseph Touch.
2011-02-01
05 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-01-19
05 David Harrington Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR is assigned to Joseph Touch
2011-01-19
05 David Harrington Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR is assigned to Joseph Touch
2011-01-18
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to David McGrew
2011-01-18
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to David McGrew
2011-01-18
05 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-01-18
05 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To ...
2011-01-18
05 Amy Vezza Last Call text changed
2011-01-17
05 Jari Arkko Last Call was requested
2011-01-17
05 Jari Arkko State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation.
2011-01-17
05 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-01-17
05 (System) Last call text was added
2011-01-17
05 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-01-17
05 Jari Arkko Last Call text changed
2010-12-21
05 Jari Arkko State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Jari Arkko
2010-11-10
05 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Julien Laganier (julienl@qualcomm.com) is the document shepherd.' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-11-10
05 Cindy Morgan
  (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
        Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the ...
2010-11-10
05 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2010-10-15
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues-02.txt
2010-06-30
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues-01.txt
2010-06-04
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues-00.txt