Reducing the TIME-WAIT State Using TCP Timestamps
RFC 6191

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
04 (System) Notify list changed from tcpm-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-timestamps@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
04 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
04 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2011-04-06
04 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'BCP 159; RFC 6191' added by Cindy Morgan
2011-04-06
04 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-04-05
04 (System) RFC published
2011-02-08
04 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-02-07
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2011-02-07
04 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-02-07
04 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-02-07
04 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2011-02-07
04 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-02-07
04 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text changed
2011-02-07
04 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text changed
2011-02-07
04 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-02-04
04 Lars Eggert State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed.
2011-02-04
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-timestamps-04.txt
2011-02-03
04 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-02-03
04 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-02-03
04 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
[Revised 2 February]

Nice document, very clear presentation.

I have one relatively minor issue with the Security Considerations section: the
first sentence doesn't ...
2011-02-03
04 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-02-02
04 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
I think it would be better to point to draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-security, rather than [CPNI-TCP],
since it will represent community consensus with respect to security ...
2011-02-02
04 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
[Revised 2 February]

Nice document, very clear presentation.

I have one relatively minor issue with the Security Considerations section: the
first sentence doesn't ...
2011-01-28
04 Lars Eggert Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-02-03
2010-12-19
04 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-12-19
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-timestamps-03.txt
2010-12-17
04 Lars Eggert State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2010-12-16
04 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Scott Kelly.
2010-12-16
04 Amy Vezza State changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation.
2010-12-16
04 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-16
04 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-16
04 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-12-15
04 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2010-12-15
04 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
This is a DISCUSS-DISCUSS (i.e., there is nothing for the author to do at this time).

Should this draft be a BCP or ...
2010-12-15
04 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to Discuss from No Objection
2010-12-15
04 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
I support Tim's discuss.
2010-12-15
04 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-15
04 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
Nice document, very clear presentation.

I have some relatively minor issues with the Security Considerations section, plus a discuss-discuss issue.

(1)
The first ...
2010-12-15
04 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
Nice document, very clear presentation.

I have some relatively minor issues with the Security Considerations section:

(1)
The first paragraph doesn't really seem ...
2010-12-15
04 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2010-12-15
04 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
Nice document, very clear presentation.

I have some relatively minor issues with the Security Considerations section:

(1)
The first paragraph doesn't really seem ...
2010-12-15
04 Russ Housley [Ballot comment]
I expected a few (minor) changes following the Gen-ART Review by
  Francis Dupont on 2010-12-10.  The changes have not appeared yet.
2010-12-15
04 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-15
04 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Stylistic suggestion: in the bullets in section 2, either include
  the parenthetical "(creating a connection in the SYN-RECEIVED
  state)" in every ...
2010-12-15
04 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-14
04 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-14
04 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-14
04 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-14
04 David Harrington
[Ballot comment]
section 3:
s/are important for TCPs that/are important for TCP connections that/

s/break prevent/prevent/

appendix A: "the workaround in RFC 1337" - can ...
2010-12-13
04 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-13
04 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
2*MSL

Term not defined in the document.
2010-12-13
04 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-13
04 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
The Timestamps option, specified in RFC 1323 [RFC1323], allows a TCP
  to include a timestamp value in its segments, that can be ...
2010-12-13
04 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-12
04 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-07
04 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Lars Eggert
2010-12-07
04 Lars Eggert Ballot has been issued
2010-12-07
04 Lars Eggert Created "Approve" ballot
2010-12-07
04 Lars Eggert Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-12-16
2010-12-07
04 Lars Eggert State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup.
2010-12-07
04 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-12-07
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-timestamps-02.txt
2010-12-07
04 Lars Eggert State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2010-12-07
04 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2010-12-03
04 Amanda Baber We understand that this document does not require any IANA actions.
2010-11-30
04 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Scott Kelly
2010-11-30
04 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Scott Kelly
2010-11-23
04 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-11-23
04 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2010-11-23
04 Lars Eggert Last Call was requested
2010-11-23
04 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-11-23
04 (System) Last call text was added
2010-11-23
04 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-11-23
04 Lars Eggert State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation.
2010-11-23
04 Lars Eggert Last Call text changed
2010-11-23
04 Lars Eggert Last Call text changed
2010-11-23
04 Lars Eggert State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2010-11-22
04 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'Wesley Eddy (Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov) is the document shepherd.' added by Amy Vezza
2010-11-22
04 Amy Vezza
draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-timestamps
 
  (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
        Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of ...
2010-11-22
04 Amy Vezza Draft Added by Amy Vezza in state Publication Requested
2010-11-16
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-timestamps-01.txt
2010-06-21
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-timestamps-00.txt