Extensions to IS-IS for Layer-2 Systems
RFC 6165

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.

(Jari Arkko) Yes

(Ron Bonica) Yes

Comment (2011-01-17 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
Please run the nit-checker. There are a few missing and unused references.

(Stewart Bryant) Yes

(Ralph Droms) (was Discuss) Yes

Comment (2011-01-18)
No email
send info
Extraordinarily pedantic nit: MAC address in section 2.1 is not to scale; suggested


   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                          MAC (1)    (6 bytes)                 |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                   .................                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                          MAC (N)    (6 bytes)                 |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

(Adrian Farrel) Yes

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

Comment (2011-01-17 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
Section 2.2., paragraph 2:
>    o  Type: TLV Type, set to MT-PORT-CAP TLV 143 [TBD].

  What's TBD here?

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2011-01-19 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
  Please consider the editorial comments in the Gen-ART Review by
  Kathleen Moriarty on 19- Jan-2011.

Alexey Melnikov No Objection

Comment (2011-01-14 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
2.2.  Multi Topology aware Port Capability TLV

   o  Topology Identifier: MT ID is a 12-bit field containing the MT ID
      of the topology being announced.  This field when set to zero
      implies that it is being used to carry base topology information.

Excuse my ignorance, but is this description actually sufficient for interoperability? Which values are valid here and where are they coming from?


Also I don't think specifying exact values before they are assigned by IANA is a good idea.

(Tim Polk) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Peter Saint-Andre) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

(Sean Turner) No Objection