IMAP LIST Extension for Special-Use Mailboxes
RFC 6154

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

Alexey Melnikov Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Ralph Droms) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

Comment (2010-12-13 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
I don't think it is appropriate to use RFC2119 terminology in the
Abstract.

It is probably also not appropriate in the Introduction.

---

It would be nice to capitalise the section headings.

---

Section 7

   LIST response: There are no security issues with conveying special-
   use information to a client.

Really. Doesn't the exchange of information imply that there is 
potential to intercept the information. Knowledge of the message store
usage may be valuable to someone attempting to access messages.

(David Harrington) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Tim Polk) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Peter Saint-Andre) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

(Sean Turner) (was Discuss) No Objection