IMAP LIST Extension for Special-Use Mailboxes
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
(Alexey Melnikov) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
(Ron Bonica) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection
(Ralph Droms) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Lars Eggert) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel) No Objection
Comment (2010-12-13 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
I don't think it is appropriate to use RFC2119 terminology in the Abstract. It is probably also not appropriate in the Introduction. --- It would be nice to capitalise the section headings. --- Section 7 LIST response: There are no security issues with conveying special- use information to a client. Really. Doesn't the exchange of information imply that there is potential to intercept the information. Knowledge of the message store usage may be valuable to someone attempting to access messages.