MD4 to Historic Status
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.
(Jari Arkko) Yes
(Russ Housley) Yes
(Alexey Melnikov) Yes
Comment (2010-12-19 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
The document header has: Updates: 1320 (once approved) Why not "Obsoletes: 1320" ?
(Peter Saint-Andre) Yes
(Robert Sparks) Yes
(Ron Bonica) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection
(Ralph Droms) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel) No Objection
Comment (2011-01-05 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
As with the MD2 document, I think it is worth listing the standards track documents shown in Section 3 as Updated in the document header. It looks to me that you might also want to update some of the informational documents listed here. The prime benefit is that those documents will be marked in the RFC repository as having been updated by this document. --- Abstract, etc. Once published, this document should be more assertive. Thus: OLD This document recommends RFC 1320 be moved to Historic status. NEW This document moves RFC 1320 to Historic status. END etc. --- 4. Impact on Moving MD4 to Historic s/on/of/ --- Section 4 o MD4 was used in the Inter-Domain Routing Protocol (IDRP); each IDRP message carries a 16-octet hash that is computed by applying the MD-4 algorithm (RFC 1320) to the context of the message itself. Over time IDRP was replaced by BGP-4. Need to add a refernce to 4271, and an indication that BGP-4 requires at least MD-5. You could reference 2385, but that might be de trop. --- Section 4 o The three Microsoft RFCs, [RFC2433], [RFC2759], and [RFC4757], are Do we need to describe these as "Microsoft RFCs"? How about: "The three RFCs describing Microsoft protocols"?