ANSI C12.22, IEEE 1703, and MC12.22 Transport Over IP
RFC 6142

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection

Comment (2010-07-01)
No email
send info
Section 3.4.1., paragraph 1:
>    Service, of ANSI C12.22, this specification RECOMMENDEDS that the

  Rephrase RECOMMENDEDS with a valid RFC2119 term ("is RECOMMENDED").

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2010-07-01 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
I think this is an important specification and in relatively OK
shape technically, and we should move it forward. A couple of comments,
however:

First, I agree with Lars Eggert's discuss on 63K UDP packets and
fragmentation.

Second, I think the document is quite hard to read. Its partially that
I don't have C12.12 background and partially because of the writing
style and partially because much of the big picture is missing.

(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2010-07-01 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
Support Stewart's discuss - the document would benefit greatly from more exposition.

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection

No Objection (2010-06-30)
No email
send info
Please consider the comment provided in the Gen-ART Review by
  Spencer Dawkins on 2010-06-15:

    http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/
    draft-c1222-transport-over-ip-03-dawkins.txt

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info