IPv4 Run-Out and IPv4-IPv6 Co-Existence Scenarios
RFC 6127

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2018-12-20
06 (System)
Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'When IPv6 was designed, it was expected that the transition from IPv4 to IPv6 would occur …
2015-10-14
06 (System) Notify list changed from jari.arkko@piuha.net, townsley@cisco.com, draft-arkko-townsley-coexistence@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Adrian Farrel
2011-05-26
06 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-05-25
06 (System) RFC published
2010-10-25
06 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2010-10-25
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2010-10-25
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-10-25
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-10-25
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2010-10-25
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-10-25
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza
2010-10-22
06 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Sean Turner
2010-10-22
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-10-22
06 (System) New version available: draft-arkko-townsley-coexistence-06.txt
2010-10-22
06 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-10-21
2010-10-21
06 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-10-21
06 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-10-21
06 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
This is a discuss-discuss (nothing for the authors for the authors to do)

From the secdir review:

It would be nice if either …
2010-10-21
06 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-10-21
06 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-10-20
06 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I like this document and find it useful *now*. However, the Abstract and the start of Section 1 make a strong statement about …
2010-10-20
06 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Adrian Farrel
2010-10-20
06 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-10-20
06 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-10-20
06 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I don't find the Security section very strong or helpful. I think that
rather than pointing to an example (non-normative)



And a couple …
2010-10-20
06 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
It's a tiny, pettifogging Discuss, but...

I like this document and find it useful *now*. That suggests that its classification as Informational is …
2010-10-20
06 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-10-19
06 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-10-18
06 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
A well written document.

nit:

old
The tunnel could created in any number of
new
The tunnel could be created in any number …
2010-10-18
06 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Stewart Bryant
2010-10-18
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-10-18
06 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
From the Security Directorate review:

  The security considerations section does exist and defers to
  wing-nat-pt-replacement-comparison for some of the solutions.
  …
2010-10-18
06 Ralph Droms State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Ralph Droms
2010-10-14
06 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-10-12
06 Amy Vezza State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by Amy Vezza
2010-10-11
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Shawn Emery.
2010-09-29
05 (System) New version available: draft-arkko-townsley-coexistence-05.txt
2010-09-29
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-09-17
06 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.
2010-09-15
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Shawn Emery
2010-09-15
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Shawn Emery
2010-09-13
06 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-09-13
06 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-09-13
06 Ralph Droms Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-10-21 by Ralph Droms
2010-09-13
06 Ralph Droms Status Date has been changed to 2010-09-15 from None by Ralph Droms
2010-09-13
06 Ralph Droms Last Call was requested by Ralph Droms
2010-09-13
06 Ralph Droms State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Ralph Droms
2010-09-13
06 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2010-09-13
06 Ralph Droms Ballot has been issued by Ralph Droms
2010-09-13
06 Ralph Droms Created "Approve" ballot
2010-09-13
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-09-13
06 (System) Last call text was added
2010-09-13
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-09-06
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-09-06
04 (System) New version available: draft-arkko-townsley-coexistence-04.txt
2009-11-17
06 Ralph Droms State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Ralph Droms
2009-08-18
06 Ralph Droms State Changes to AD Evaluation::AD Followup from AD Evaluation by Ralph Droms
2009-07-15
06 Ralph Droms State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Ralph Droms
2009-07-15
06 Ralph Droms Note field has been cleared by Ralph Droms
2009-07-13
06 Cindy Morgan
(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the Document
Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the document and, in
particular, does he …
2009-07-13
06 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2009-07-13
03 (System) New version available: draft-arkko-townsley-coexistence-03.txt
2009-07-13
02 (System) New version available: draft-arkko-townsley-coexistence-02.txt
2009-07-06
01 (System) New version available: draft-arkko-townsley-coexistence-01.txt
2009-03-23
06 (System) Document has expired
2008-09-19
00 (System) New version available: draft-arkko-townsley-coexistence-00.txt