Flow Bindings in Mobile IPv6 and Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support
RFC 6089

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
11 (System) Notify list changed from mext-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stewart Bryant
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Adrian Farrel
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Abstain position for Lars Eggert
2011-01-31
11 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-01-31
11 Cindy Morgan [Note]: changed to 'RFC 6089'
2011-01-28
11 (System) RFC published
2010-10-07
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2010-10-07
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2010-10-07
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2010-10-05
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2010-10-05
11 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2010-10-05
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-11.txt
2010-10-04
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-10-04
11 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-10-04
11 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2010-10-04
11 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-10-04
11 Jari Arkko State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Jari Arkko
2010-10-04
11 Jari Arkko [Note]: 'Marcelo Bagnulo (marcelo@it.uc3m.es) is the document shepherd.' added by Jari Arkko
2010-09-20
11 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to Abstain from Discuss by Lars Eggert
2010-09-14
11 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-09-14
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-10.txt
2010-09-10
11 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-09-09
2010-09-09
11 Amy Vezza State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::External Party by Amy Vezza
2010-09-08
11 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
Section 2., paragraph 5:
>    Note that per-packet load balancing may have negative impacts on TCP
>    congestion avoidance mechanisms as …
2010-09-08
11 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
DISCUSS-DISCUSS: There have been several revisions since Allison
  Mankin's tsv-dir review, but it's unclear if the issues she raises
  have resulted …
2010-09-08
11 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-09-08
11 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
Cleared
2010-09-08
11 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Stewart Bryant
2010-09-07
11 Jari Arkko [Note]: 'On the agenda to clear the last Discuss.
Marcelo Bagnulo (marcelo@it.uc3m.es) is the document shepherd.' added by Jari Arkko
2010-09-07
11 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-09-09 by Jari Arkko
2010-09-07
11 Jari Arkko Waiting on Stewart to clear, as his requested change was implemented
in -07. Sent a reminder.
2010-08-17
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-09.txt
2010-08-17
11 Jari Arkko State Changes to IESG Evaluation::External Party from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Jari Arkko
2010-08-17
11 Jari Arkko Waiting for Stewart to clear and/or continue discussion
2010-08-16
11 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alexey Melnikov has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Alexey Melnikov
2010-08-16
11 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot comment]
2010-08-16
11 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot discuss]
2010-08-16
11 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Adrian Farrel
2010-08-16
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-08.txt
2010-08-16
11 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Sean Turner
2010-08-16
11 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-08-16
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-07.txt
2010-05-18
11 Jari Arkko State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Jari Arkko
2010-05-18
11 Jari Arkko Sent a request to the authors to update the spec. All comments seem
valid.
2010-05-11
11 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Tina Tsou.
2010-05-06
11 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-05-06
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Amy Vezza
2010-05-06
11 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
I support Sean's discuss issue:  The Security Considerations section should include explicit pointers to the Security Considerations sections in RFCs 3775, 3963, and …
2010-05-06
11 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-05-06
11 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-05-06
11 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) I would like the authors to consider adding the following text (from Tina Tsou's SECDIR review) to the security considerations:

This specification …
2010-05-06
11 Sean Turner [Ballot discuss]
#1) Add references to RFCs 3775, 3963, and 5555 in the Security Considerations.
2010-05-06
11 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-05-06
11 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-05-05
11 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
Doesn't this document update RFC 5648?
As it says in section 4.1...
  This specification updates the definition of the Binding Identifier
  …
2010-05-05
11 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-05-05
11 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-05-05
11 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-05-05
11 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-05-05
11 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
"The receiver MUST quietly ignore and skip over the option"

I think that the authors mean silently.

The abbreviations BU, HA, CN, MN …
2010-05-05
11 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
There are many instances in this document where the authors say value 0 is reserved and SHOULD NOT be used. In each case …
2010-05-05
11 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Stewart Bryant
2010-05-05
11 Tim Polk [Ballot comment]
The Security Considerations section should include explicit pointers to the Security Considerations sections in RFCs 3775, 3963, and 5555.
2010-05-05
11 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2010-05-04
11 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-05-03
11 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-05-02
11 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
4.2.  Flow Identification Mobility Option

      FID

        FID = 0 is reserved and SHOULD NOT be used. …
2010-05-02
11 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
[Updated:]
This is a fine document and I was about to vote "No Objections" when I noticed the following:

5.2.2.1.  New Flow Bindings …
2010-05-01
11 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
4.2.  Flow Identification Mobility Option

      FID

        FID = 0 is reserved and SHOULD NOT be used. …
2010-05-01
11 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
This is a fine document and I was about to vote "No Objections" when I noticed the following:

5.2.2.1.  New Flow Bindings

  …
2010-05-01
11 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2010-05-01
11 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
4.2.  Flow Identification Mobility Option

      FID

        FID = 0 is reserved and SHOULD NOT be used. …
2010-04-25
11 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tina Tsou
2010-04-25
11 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tina Tsou
2010-04-19
11 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-04-19
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-04-19
11 Jari Arkko State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Jari Arkko
2010-04-19
11 Jari Arkko Last Call was requested by Jari Arkko
2010-04-19
11 Jari Arkko new version looks good
2010-04-19
11 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-05-06 by Jari Arkko
2010-03-22
11 Amanda Baber
IANA questions/comments:

ACTION 1:

make the following assignments in the "Mobility Options" registry at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/mobility-parameters/mobility-parameters.xhtml

Value Description Reference
----- ------------------- ---------
TBD Flow Identification [RFC-mext-flow-binding-06] …
2010-03-01
11 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-03-01
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-06.txt
2010-02-26
11 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2010-02-26
11 Jari Arkko Ballot has been issued by Jari Arkko
2010-02-26
11 Jari Arkko Created "Approve" ballot
2010-02-26
11 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-02-26
11 (System) Last call text was added
2010-02-26
11 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-02-26
11 Jari Arkko
I have reviewed this specification. It is basically in very good shape, but I did detect a few small issues. Please correct them so that …
2010-02-26
11 Jari Arkko State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Jari Arkko
2010-02-25
11 Jari Arkko State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Jari Arkko
2010-02-10
11 Cindy Morgan
  (1.a)  Who is the Document Shepherd for this document?  Has the
          Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the …
2010-02-10
11 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2010-02-10
11 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Marcelo Bagnulo (marcelo@it.uc3m.es) is the document shepherd.' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-02-09
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-05.txt
2009-11-09
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-04.txt
2009-07-13
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-03.txt
2009-04-30
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-02.txt
2009-02-14
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-01.txt
2008-05-18
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-00.txt