Segmented Pseudowire
RFC 6073

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 18 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert (was Discuss) No Objection

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss, No Objection, Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2010-09-17)
No email
send info
Thanks for version 18 which addresses my remaining comments.

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2009-09-10)
No email
send info
I also support Lars Eggerts discuss regarding congestion control. It seems that multi-segment in its various combinations have many potential ways of breaking the congestion control loop. Thus that fact and what can be done on the signalling plane by the S-PE is important.

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection

No Objection (2009-09-10)
No email
send info
  The Gen-ART Review by Sean Turner on 31-Aug-2009 raises a few questions:

  - Do you really want 7 authors?  The RFC Editor prefers 5 or less.

  - Should the Introduction be Section 1?

  - Sec 7.4.1: Indicates the PW Switching Point description string is
    80 characters long.  Should it say more about the character set?

  - Sec 8.4.1: Figure shows both AC "Up" and AC "UP".  Should they all
    be "Up"?

  - Sec 16: s/Author's/Authors'

  - There are a couple of places where " , " should be changed to ", "

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info