Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions
RFC 6066

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.

(Pasi Eronen) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes

Alexey Melnikov (was Discuss) Yes

Comment (2010-08-11)
No email
send info
I am agreeing with Peter's DISCUSS.

Additionally, I have the following comments:

10.1 pkipath MIME Type Registration


The "Encoding Considerations" section should say that the data is binary.


  Person & email address to contact for further information:
      Magnus Nystrom <magnus@rsasecurity.com>

I vaguely remember that Magnus has changed jobs since, so this email address is no longer valid.

(Sean Turner) Yes

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

Comment (2010-08-09 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
  == Unused Reference: 'RFC2119' is defined on line 1027, but no explicit
     reference was found in the text

  -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 2246
     (Obsoleted by RFC 4346)

  -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 4346
     (Obsoleted by RFC 5246)

  -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 4366
     (Obsoleted by RFC 5246)

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2010-09-20)
No email
send info
Thanks for addressng my Discuss and Comment. I have Cleared.

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Tim Polk) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Peter Saint-Andre) (was Discuss) No Objection