Unicast-Prefix-Based IPv4 Multicast Addresses
RFC 6034

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
06 (System) Notify list changed from mboned-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mboned-ipv4-uni-based-mcast@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2010-10-25
06 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan
2010-10-25
06 Cindy Morgan [Note]: changed to 'RFC 6034' by Cindy Morgan
2010-10-22
06 (System) RFC published
2010-08-30
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2010-08-30
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2010-08-30
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on RFC Editor
2010-08-30
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on WGC
2010-08-10
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on WGC from In Progress
2010-08-10
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-08-09
06 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2010-08-06
06 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-08-06
06 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2010-08-06
06 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-07-17
06 Ron Bonica State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Ron Bonica
2010-07-16
06 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Tim Polk
2010-07-08
06 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
The draft seems to imply that an organization must choose between these allocation methods. 
I don’t see why that is the case.  Is …
2010-07-08
06 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
This is a revised discuss.

It feels a bit odd to be evaluating a standards track competitor to a current BCP (RFC 3180). …
2010-07-08
06 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
The draft seems to imply that an organization must choose between these allocation methods.  I don’t see why that is the case.  Is …
2010-07-08
06 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
This is a revised discuss.

It feels a bit odd to be evaluating a standards track competitor to a current BCP (RFC 3180). …
2010-06-20
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Shawn Emery.
2010-06-18
06 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-06-17
2010-06-17
06 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-06-17
06 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-06-17
06 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-06-17
06 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-06-17
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-06-16
06 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
Please consider the Gen-ART Review by Francis Dupont on 2010-05-12:

  - 1 page 3: assignment ... need -> assignments?
    (please …
2010-06-16
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-06-16
06 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-06-16
06 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
I share Tim's concern that we need to explore the extent of IETF consensus on this proposal.

In particular there are not many …
2010-06-16
06 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
I share Tim's concern that we need to explore the extent of IETF consensus on this proposal.

In particular there are not many …
2010-06-16
06 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Stewart Bryant
2010-06-16
06 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2010-06-16
06 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2010-06-15
06 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-06-15
06 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-06-15
06 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
This is a discuss-discuss.

It feels a bit odd to be evaluating a standards track competitor to a current BCP (RFC 3180).
This …
2010-06-15
06 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-06-15
06 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Harrington
2010-06-14
06 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-06-01
06 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2010-06-01
06 Ron Bonica Ballot has been issued by Ron Bonica
2010-06-01
06 Ron Bonica Created "Approve" ballot
2010-06-01
06 Ron Bonica State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Ron Bonica
2010-06-01
06 Ron Bonica Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-06-17 by Ron Bonica
2010-05-17
06 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-05-13
06 Amanda Baber
IANA comments:

This document updates RFC 5771, as it sets an algorithm for the
assignment of this particular /8. We'd like to add some language …
2010-05-04
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Shawn Emery
2010-05-04
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Shawn Emery
2010-05-03
06 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-05-03
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-05-03
06 Ron Bonica State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Ron Bonica
2010-05-03
06 Ron Bonica Last Call was requested by Ron Bonica
2010-05-03
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-05-03
06 (System) Last call text was added
2010-05-03
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-04-23
06 Ron Bonica State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Ron Bonica
2010-04-22
06 Cindy Morgan Intended Status has been changed to Proposed Standard from None
2010-04-22
06 Cindy Morgan

Technical Summary

This specification defines an extension to the multicast addressing
architecture of the IP Version 4 protocol. The extension presented
in this document allows …
2010-04-22
06 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2010-04-22
06 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Lenny Giuliano (lenny@juniper.net) is the Document Shepherd.' added by Cindy Morgan
2009-03-09
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mboned-ipv4-uni-based-mcast-06.txt
2008-02-25
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mboned-ipv4-uni-based-mcast-05.txt
2007-07-30
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mboned-ipv4-uni-based-mcast-04.txt
2007-03-07
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mboned-ipv4-uni-based-mcast-03.txt
2004-10-28
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mboned-ipv4-uni-based-mcast-02.txt
2004-01-20
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mboned-ipv4-uni-based-mcast-01.txt
2002-07-03
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mboned-ipv4-uni-based-mcast-00.txt