Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) User Agent Configuration
RFC 6011

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

(Gonzalo Camarillo) Yes

(Cullen Jennings) Yes

(Dan Romascanu) Yes

(Peter Saint-Andre) (was Discuss) Yes

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

(Ralph Droms) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2010-05-05 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
  > 2.2.1.  The Local Network Domain
  >
  >    The UA MUST attempt to use the Local Network Domain name (see
  >    Section 2.1.2, "Network Layer Provisioning") as the Configuration
  >    Service Domain.  If multiple DNS names are provided by DHCPv6 option
  >    21, the UA MUST attempt to use each of the names provided, in the
  >    order they were given by the DHCPv6 service, until a configuration is
  >    successfully obtained.
  >
  >    If the DHCP service does not provide any local domain name value,
  >    the UA SHOULD use the manual mechanism defined in Section 2.2.2,
  >    "Manual Domain Name Entry".
  >
  Please add something here about what to do if the SIP UA is connected
  to more than one network and gets responses from more than one DHCP
  server, presumeably one associated with each interface.

Alexey Melnikov (was Discuss) No Objection

(Sean Turner) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2010-06-21)
No email
send info
#1) Sec 1: You might want to answer the question with .  This document provides the answer.

#2) Sec 1.1: Seems like you're dancing around not using 2119 language:

  OLD:

   A User Agent implementation compliant to this specification
   MAY also implement additional mechanisms that may be required in
   particular environments, or for use when the services specified
   here are not available.

  NEW:

   A User Agent implementation compliant to this specification
   MAY also implement additional mechanisms necessary for particular
   environments, or for use when the services specified here are not
   available.

#3) Sec 2.4.2: Is the list of failures inclusive or are there other ways it can fail?

#4) Sec 3.1: r/should/SHOULD

#5) Sec 5: r/Url/URL

#6) Sec 5: r/to provide for including that/to provide that

(Robert Sparks) Recuse