Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths
RFC 6006

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2018-12-20
11 (System)
Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'Point-to-point Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSPs ...
2015-10-14
11 (System) Notify list changed from pce-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stewart Bryant
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2010-09-22
11 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan
2010-09-22
11 Cindy Morgan [Note]: changed to 'RFC 6006' by Cindy Morgan
2010-09-21
11 (System) RFC published
2010-06-11
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2010-06-11
11 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2010-06-11
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2010-06-11
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2010-06-11
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2010-06-11
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-06-11
11 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-06-11
11 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2010-06-11
11 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-06-11
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza
2010-06-04
11 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Harrington has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by David Harrington
2010-06-04
11 David Harrington [Ballot comment]
2010-06-04
11 David Harrington [Ballot discuss]
2010-05-31
11 David Harrington [Ballot comment]
s/enable to disable/enable or disable/
2010-05-31
11 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
1) the new text in 3.10 paragraph 4 is a bit difficult to read. It has an incomplete sentence - 2d sentence in ...
2010-05-31
11 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Stewart Bryant
2010-05-25
11 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Tim Polk
2010-05-25
11 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to Undefined from Discuss by Tim Polk
2010-05-25
11 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Dan Romascanu
2010-05-25
11 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-05-25
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-11.txt
2010-05-05
11 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Sean Turner
2010-04-25
11 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Lt. Mundy.
2010-04-23
11 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-04-22
2010-04-22
11 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-04-22
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Amy Vezza
2010-04-22
11 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
I support Tim's DISCUSS position too.

Some new comments based on Russ Mundy's SECDIR review:

1) RFC4875 Security Considerations requires that ...
2010-04-22
11 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
I updated my DISCUSS to remove the DISCUSS-DISCUSS.  Everything else remains the same.

PCEP requires use of TCP-MD5 with recognition of its ...
2010-04-22
11 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-04-22
11 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-04-22
11 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
I support Tim's DISCUSS position too.

Some new comments based on Russ Mundy's SECDIR review:

1) RFC4875 Security Considerations requires that ...
2010-04-22
11 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
PCEP requires use of TCP-MD5 with recognition of its failings, specifically mentioning that TCP-AO was not yet complete.  But as TCP-AO has ...
2010-04-22
11 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Sean Turner
2010-04-22
11 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
> 4.6. Impact on Network Operation

>  It is expected that use of PCEP extensions specified in this document
>  does not ...
2010-04-22
11 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
The DISCUSS is partially based on issues raised initially by Fred Baker in the OPS-DIR review.

> 4.2. Information and Data Models ...
2010-04-22
11 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-04-21
11 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-04-21
11 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-04-21
11 David Harrington
[Ballot comment]
I found the document difficult to read and review.

The requirements section 2 doesn't use sentences, so it is difficult to understand ...
2010-04-21
11 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
1) section 3.1.1 discusses advertising P2MP by setting bit 10 (TBA by IANA), but this request is not made in the ...
2010-04-21
11 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-04-21
11 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by David Harrington
2010-04-20
11 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-04-20
11 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
The following text
====

Four values are possible for the leaf type field:

  1.  New leaves to add;
  2.  Old ...
2010-04-20
11 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
The text under figure 2 looks to be incorrect, the length in the IPv6 case is surely n*16 + 4, and not n ...
2010-04-20
11 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Stewart Bryant
2010-04-20
11 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-04-19
11 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
I support Tim's DISCUSS position.
2010-04-19
11 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-04-19
11 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2010-04-19
11 Adrian Farrel Ballot has been issued by Adrian Farrel
2010-04-19
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-10.txt
2010-04-19
11 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
The security considerations state:

  As described in [PCE-P2MP-REQ], P2MP path computation requests are
  more CPU-intensive and also use more link bandwidth ...
2010-04-19
11 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-04-19
11 Tim Polk Created "Approve" ballot
2010-04-14
11 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-04-12
11 Amanda Baber
IANA questions/comments:

QUESTIONS:

- Section 6.5 claims that six PCE Objects have been defined, but only
four object class values are present. Did you ...
2010-04-02
11 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Lt. Mundy
2010-04-02
11 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Lt. Mundy
2010-04-02
11 Samuel Weiler Assignment of request for Last Call review by SECDIR to Barry Leiba was rejected
2010-04-01
11 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Barry Leiba
2010-04-01
11 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Barry Leiba
2010-03-31
11 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2010-03-31
11 Cindy Morgan State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Cindy Morgan
2010-03-31
11 Adrian Farrel Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-04-22 by Adrian Farrel
2010-03-31
11 Adrian Farrel Last Call was requested by Adrian Farrel
2010-03-31
11 Adrian Farrel State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Adrian Farrel
2010-03-31
11 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-03-31
11 (System) Last call text was added
2010-03-31
11 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-03-31
11 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-03-31
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-09.txt
2010-03-31
11 Adrian Farrel State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Adrian Farrel
2010-03-31
11 Adrian Farrel

AD review

idnits v2.12.02 says
  -- Couldn't find a document date in the document -- date freshness
    check skipped.

The page ...
2010-03-31
11 Adrian Farrel State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Adrian Farrel
2010-03-31
11 Cindy Morgan
Proto-write-up for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-08
Intended status : Standard Track

> (1.a)  Who is the Document Shepherd for this document?  Has the
>      ...
2010-03-31
11 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2010-03-31
11 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'JP Vasseur (jpv@cisco.com) is the document shepherd.' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-03-24
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-08.txt
2010-02-02
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-07.txt
2009-12-30
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-06.txt
2009-10-26
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-05.txt
2009-08-18
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-04.txt
2009-07-13
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-03.txt
2009-03-09
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-02.txt
2008-11-03
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-01.txt
2008-09-09
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-00.txt