Forward Error Correction Grouping Semantics in the Session Description Protocol
RFC 5956

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
10 (System) Notify list changed from mmusic-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-09-21
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2010-09-21
10 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 5956' added by Amy Vezza
2010-09-21
10 (System) RFC published
2010-06-10
10 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2010-06-10
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2010-06-09
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2010-06-09
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2010-06-09
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2010-06-09
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-06-09
10 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-06-09
10 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2010-06-09
10 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-06-09
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-10.txt
2010-06-09
10 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Harrington has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by David Harrington
2010-06-09
10 David Harrington [Ballot comment]
2010-06-09
10 David Harrington [Ballot discuss]
2010-05-31
10 David Harrington
[Ballot comment]
1) there are so many conditionals in 4.4 amd 4.5, it becomes hard to tell what behavior is MUST, SHOULD, or MAY. Could …
2010-05-31
10 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
1) The new section 4.4 deprecates the FEC semantics, and it says "FEC-FR must be used instead; it then recommends also supporting FEC …
2010-05-12
10 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Lars Eggert
2010-05-10
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-09.txt
2010-04-29
10 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
The -08 revision addresses nearly everything from my previous Discuss and Comment.

In my Discuss I said:

>> Section 3.2
>> It is …
2010-04-29
10 Adrian Farrel [Ballot discuss]
2010-04-29
10 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Adrian Farrel
2010-04-29
10 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alexey Melnikov has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Alexey Melnikov
2010-04-29
10 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot discuss]
2010-04-29
10 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] Position for Gonzalo Camarillo has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-04-28
10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-04-28
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-08.txt
2010-04-23
10 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-04-22
2010-04-22
10 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-04-22
10 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-04-22
10 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-04-22
10 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
A number of minor nits that you might fix to save the RFC Editor some
time and effort.

---
Throughout the document, please …
2010-04-22
10 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
Two of my Discuss issues overlap somewhat with points raised by other ADs. I hope they can all be addressed with relatively small …
2010-04-22
10 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-04-22
10 Gonzalo Camarillo
[Ballot discuss]
With respect to having this document update RFC3388bis, I guess the reason is that Section 4.5 of this document updates the ABNF syntax …
2010-04-22
10 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-04-21
10 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-04-21
10 David Harrington
[Ballot comment]
1) "It should be noted that" - if you include the rest of the sentence, then it IS noted, so this clause can …
2010-04-21
10 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
1) I would like to support Lars's discuss regarding 3833bis - why is 3833bis simply not modified to include the grouping semantics?

2) …
2010-04-21
10 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by David Harrington
2010-04-21
10 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
Two nits on the security considerations:

1) r/failure of FEC to protect, and/or mishandling of other media payload streams/failure of FEC to protect, …
2010-04-21
10 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-04-21
10 Tim Polk [Ballot comment]
I support Alexey's discuss with respect to section 4.4.
2010-04-21
10 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-04-21
10 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Stewart Bryant
2010-04-20
10 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
Please consider the Gen-ART Review comments from David Black:

  The IPv4 addresses used in the examples are not from the 192.0.2.0/24
  …
2010-04-20
10 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-04-20
10 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
Section 1., paragraph 1:
>    Any application that needs a reliable transmission over an unreliable
>    packet network has to cope …
2010-04-20
10 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 1:
> Updates:  4756, 3388bis, 5576 (if approved)

  DISCUSS: I'd like to dissect the relationships between these documents
  for …
2010-04-20
10 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-04-19
10 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
Please spell out "SSRC" on first use.

The text "It is RECOMMENDED that the receiver SHOULD do integrity check" is conformance language overload; …
2010-04-19
10 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-04-13
10 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
I have a couple of comments I would like to discuss before recommending approval of this document:

1) 4.4.  SDP Offer-Answer Model and …
2010-04-13
10 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2010-04-02
10 Robert Sparks Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-04-22 by Robert Sparks
2010-04-02
10 Robert Sparks State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Robert Sparks
2010-04-02
10 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2010-04-02
10 Robert Sparks Ballot has been issued by Robert Sparks
2010-04-02
10 Robert Sparks Created "Approve" ballot
2010-04-02
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-07.txt
2010-04-01
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Kurt Zeilenga.
2010-03-18
10 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-03-17
10 Amanda Baber
IANA comments:

ACTION 1:

Make the following assignment in the "Semantics for the 'group' SDP
Attribute" registry at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/sdp-parameters

Semantics Token Reference
---------------------------------- -------- --------- …
2010-03-06
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Kurt Zeilenga
2010-03-06
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Kurt Zeilenga
2010-03-04
10 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-03-04
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-03-03
10 Robert Sparks Last Call was requested by Robert Sparks
2010-03-03
10 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-03-03
10 (System) Last call text was added
2010-03-03
10 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-03-03
10 Robert Sparks State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Robert Sparks
2010-02-11
10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-02-11
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-06.txt
2010-01-28
10 Robert Sparks State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Publication Requested by Robert Sparks
2010-01-28
10 Robert Sparks [Note]: 'Document Shepherd: Jean-Francois Mule (jf.mule@cablelabs.com)' added by Robert Sparks
2010-01-19
10 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Document Shepherd: Jean-Francois Mule (jf.mule@cablelabs.com)' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-01-19
10 Cindy Morgan
Requested Publication Status: Proposed Standard
Document Shepherd: Jean-Francois Mule (jf.mule@cablelabs.com)

--------------------------------------------------------------------
--- (1.a)
          Who is the Document Shepherd for this …
2010-01-19
10 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2009-10-19
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-05.txt
2009-10-15
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-04.txt
2009-09-23
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-03.txt
2009-04-30
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-02.txt
2009-03-09
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-01.txt
2009-01-21
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-00.txt