A Dedicated Routing Policy Specification Language Interface Identifier for Operational Testing
RFC 5943

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
05 (System) Notify list changed from brian@innovationslab.net, draft-haberman-rpsl-reachable-test@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2010-08-13
05 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan
2010-08-13
05 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'RFC 5943' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-08-13
05 (System) RFC published
2010-06-29
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2010-06-28
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2010-06-28
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-06-28
05 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-06-28
05 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2010-06-28
05 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-06-25
05 Ron Bonica State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Ron Bonica
2010-06-25
05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2010-06-07
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Jari Arkko
2010-06-02
05 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Tim Polk
2010-06-02
05 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to Undefined from Discuss by Tim Polk
2010-06-02
05 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Sean Turner
2010-06-01
05 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
FORMER DISCUSS (I still have my doubts about whether a NIC Handle truly provides a reliable link to contact information, but we'll find …
2010-06-01
05 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot discuss]
2010-06-01
05 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-05-27
05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-05-27
04 (System) New version available: draft-haberman-rpsl-reachable-test-04.txt
2010-05-27
05 (System) New version available: draft-haberman-rpsl-reachable-test-05.txt
2010-04-25
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Nicolas Williams.
2010-04-23
05 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-04-22
2010-04-22
05 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-04-22
05 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
I like this document and idea, and I fully support it going forward.
For what it is worth, I do not believe the …
2010-04-22
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-04-22
05 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2010-04-22
05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-04-22
05 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot comment]
The acronym RPSL should be expanded in the Title.
2010-04-22
05 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-04-22
05 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
+1 Sean's and Peter's discuss...

The missing security considerations section should address any controls that are needed
on intermediate systems (e.g., gateways, routers …
2010-04-22
05 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-04-22
05 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2010-04-21
05 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
The Gen-ART Review by Vijay Gurbani raised a point that deserves
  a response:

  Is the intent to have the specific IP …
2010-04-21
05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-04-20
05 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-04-19
05 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
Please demarcate the rows of the table in Section 2 -- it is confusing to read.

There are no references for the value-types …
2010-04-19
05 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot discuss]
The document lacks the required security considerations section.

From an operational perspective, the NIC Handle system is no longer supported as widely as …
2010-04-19
05 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-04-19
05 Ron Bonica State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Ron Bonica
2010-04-19
05 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-04-17
05 David Harrington
[Ballot comment]
section 2: "can advertise" - should this be a MAY or SHOULD?
section 3: "maintaner of the attribute" - would this be better …
2010-04-17
05 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Harrington
2010-04-17
05 Sean Turner [Ballot discuss]
This ID needs a security considerations section.  This section is required as per (http://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist.html) and noted in the nits checker.
2010-04-17
05 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-04-02
05 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-03-29
05 Amanda Baber IANA comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this
document to have NO IANA Actions.
2010-03-16
05 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2010-03-16
05 Ron Bonica Ballot has been issued by Ron Bonica
2010-03-16
05 Ron Bonica Created "Approve" ballot
2010-03-16
05 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-03-16
05 (System) Last call text was added
2010-03-16
05 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-03-16
05 Ron Bonica Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-04-22 by Ron Bonica
2010-03-06
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Nicolas Williams
2010-03-06
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Nicolas Williams
2010-03-05
05 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-03-05
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-03-05
05 Ron Bonica Draft Added by Ron Bonica in state Last Call Requested
2010-02-19
03 (System) New version available: draft-haberman-rpsl-reachable-test-03.txt
2009-11-09
02 (System) New version available: draft-haberman-rpsl-reachable-test-02.txt
2009-05-22
01 (System) New version available: draft-haberman-rpsl-reachable-test-01.txt
2009-05-11
00 (System) New version available: draft-haberman-rpsl-reachable-test-00.txt