Expressing SNMP SMI Datatypes in XML Schema Definition Language
RFC 5935

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2020-01-21
06 (System) Received changes through RFC Editor sync (added Verified Errata tag)
2015-10-14
06 (System) Notify list changed from opsawg-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsawg-smi-datatypes-in-xsd@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for David Harrington
2010-08-17
06 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan
2010-08-17
06 Cindy Morgan [Note]: changed to 'RFC 5935' by Cindy Morgan
2010-08-16
06 (System) RFC published
2010-06-14
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2010-06-11
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2010-06-11
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2010-06-09
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2010-06-09
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2010-06-08
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2010-06-08
06 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2010-06-08
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-06-08
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-06-08
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2010-06-08
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-06-08
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza
2010-04-22
06 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-04-22
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot comment]
I have cleared my Discuss in anticipation of the new text to
explain how TCs are handled.
2010-04-22
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot discuss]
2010-04-22
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Jari Arkko
2010-04-22
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-04-22
06 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
I am troubled by the fact that this does not cover InetAddress from
RFC 2851, i.e., only IPv4 addresses can be mapped. I …
2010-04-22
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-04-22
06 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-04-22
06 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot comment]
Acronyms such as SNMP and SMI should be expanded in the Abstract
2010-04-22
06 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-04-21
06 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Harrington has been changed to Yes from Discuss by David Harrington
2010-04-21
06 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-04-21
06 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot comment]
I think the regex for IpAddress could be shortened to something like this (but I am not a regex expert!):

((0|[1-9]?[0-9]|1[0-9][0-9]|2[0-4][0-9]|25[0-5])\.){3}(0|[1-9]?[0-9]|1[0-
9][0-9]|2[0-4][0-9]|25[0-5])
2010-04-21
06 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Tim Polk
2010-04-21
06 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to Undefined from Discuss by Tim Polk
2010-04-21
06 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
Global nit

The phrasing is inconsistent when datatypes are named.  Here are a few examples:
    XSD datatype "hexBinary"
  "hexBinary" XSD …
2010-04-21
06 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-04-21
06 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2010-04-21
06 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Stewart Bryant
2010-04-20
06 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-04-19
06 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
1) RFC3584 is a BCP. Is a stds-track document allowed to normatively reference a BCP?
2) I chaired the BOF, was involved in …
2010-04-19
06 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by David Harrington
2010-04-19
06 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-04-19
06 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
I have two comments wrt to this ID:

1) In the security considerations it says:

  "Security considerations for any given SMI MIB …
2010-04-19
06 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-04-19
06 Tim Polk [Ballot comment]
Security Considerations nit

s/are likely to be relevant/will be relevant/
2010-04-19
06 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-04-17
06 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2010-03-04
06 Dan Romascanu Telechat date was changed to 2010-04-22 from 2010-03-11 by Dan Romascanu
2010-03-04
06 Dan Romascanu State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup by Dan Romascanu
2010-03-04
06 Dan Romascanu Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-03-11 by Dan Romascanu
2010-03-04
06 Dan Romascanu Ballot has been issued by Dan Romascanu
2010-03-01
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-03-01
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsawg-smi-datatypes-in-xsd-06.txt
2010-02-11
06 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Dan Romascanu
2010-02-11
06 Dan Romascanu Ballot has been issued by Dan Romascanu
2010-02-11
06 Dan Romascanu Created "Approve" ballot
2009-08-03
06 Dan Romascanu State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Dan Romascanu
2009-07-01
06 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2009-06-25
06 Michelle Cotton
IANA Last Call comments:

Upon approval of this document, the IANA will make the following assignments in
the XML registry.

1. In the "ns" section …
2009-06-22
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Love Astrand
2009-06-22
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Love Astrand
2009-06-17
06 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2009-06-17
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2009-06-17
06 Dan Romascanu State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Dan Romascanu
2009-06-17
06 Dan Romascanu Last Call was requested by Dan Romascanu
2009-06-17
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2009-06-17
06 (System) Last call text was added
2009-06-17
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2009-06-15
06 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Scott Bradner (sob@harvard.edu) is the document shepherd.' added by Cindy Morgan
2009-06-15
06 Dan Romascanu State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Dan Romascanu
2009-05-22
06 Amy Vezza
draft-ietf-opsawg-smi-datatypes-in-xsd-05.txt
as a proposed standard

(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document?

Scott Bradner

Has the
Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of …
2009-05-22
06 Amy Vezza Draft Added by Amy Vezza in state Publication Requested
2009-03-27
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsawg-smi-datatypes-in-xsd-05.txt
2008-10-29
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsawg-smi-datatypes-in-xsd-04.txt
2008-08-25
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsawg-smi-datatypes-in-xsd-03.txt
2008-07-13
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsawg-smi-datatypes-in-xsd-02.txt
2008-02-25
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsawg-smi-datatypes-in-xsd-01.txt
2008-02-11
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsawg-smi-datatypes-in-xsd-00.txt