ICMP Attacks against TCP
RFC 5927

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
12 (System) Notify list changed from tcpm-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
12 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
12 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2010-07-07
12 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2010-07-07
12 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 5927' added by Amy Vezza
2010-07-06
12 (System) RFC published
2010-03-31
12 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2010-03-31
12 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-03-31
12 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2010-03-31
12 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-03-31
12 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2010-03-31
12 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-03-31
12 Lars Eggert State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Lars Eggert
2010-03-30
12 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Tim Polk
2010-03-30
12 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to Undefined from Discuss by Tim Polk
2010-03-30
12 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-12.txt
2010-02-25
12 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-02-25
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-11.txt
2010-02-21
12 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Dan Romascanu
2010-02-20
12 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Phillip Hallam-Baker.
2010-02-19
12 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-02-18
2010-02-18
12 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-02-18
12 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
This document should be approved as an RFC. Thanks for
writing it.

However, I would like to note the following text from the …
2010-02-18
12 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-02-18
12 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
section 7.3.2, figure 3 line 2: DATA size should be 1460, not 1500 (established MTU is 1500)

Section 7.3.5, figure 6 line 8: …
2010-02-18
12 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
This document does an admirable job of articulating the important reasons that many tcp
stacks implement these features.  However, there is a downside; …
2010-02-18
12 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
section 7.3.2, figure 3 line 2: DATA size should be 1460, not 1500 (established MTU is 1500)

Section 7.3.5, figure 6 line 8: …
2010-02-18
12 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
This document does an admirable job of articulating the important reasons that many tcp
stacks implement these features.  However, there is a downside; …
2010-02-18
12 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-02-18
12 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2010-02-18
12 Magnus Westerlund
[Ballot comment]
Section 7.1:

For IPv6, the
  reported Next-Hop MTU could be as low as 1280 octets (the minimum
  IPv6 MTU) [RFC2460].

Actually …
2010-02-18
12 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2010-02-18
12 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-02-18
12 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-02-18
12 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot comment]
Should [I-D.ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization] reference be Normative?
2010-02-18
12 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2010-02-18
12 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
I would like to discuss whether the following paragrah does not require more specific information:

>  Most of the these counter-measures can be …
2010-02-18
12 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-02-18
12 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen
2010-02-17
12 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2010-02-17
12 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
section 7.3.2, figure 3 line 2: DATA size should be 1460, not 1500 (established MTU is 1500)

Section 7.3.5, figure 6 line 8: …
2010-02-17
12 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
This is a discuss-discuss.

The working group summary in the IESG writeup states

  The WG did not reach consensus that the IETF …
2010-02-17
12 Tim Polk [Ballot comment]
section 7.3.2, figure 3 line 2: Data size should be 1460, not 1500 (established MTU is 1500)
2010-02-17
12 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
This is a discuss-discuss.

The working group summary states

  The WG did not reach consensus that the IETF
  should recommend the …
2010-02-17
12 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-02-17
12 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
section 7.3.2, figure 3 line 2: Data size should be 1460, not 1500 (established MTU is 1500)

The working group summary states

  …
2010-02-17
12 Tim Polk [Ballot comment]
section 7.3.2, figure 3 line 2: Data size should be 1460, not 1500 (established MTU is 1500)
2010-02-16
12 Amanda Baber IANA comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this
document to have NO IANA Actions.
2010-02-15
12 Lars Eggert State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Lars Eggert
2010-02-15
12 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-02-14
12 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-02-05
12 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Phillip Hallam-Baker
2010-02-05
12 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Phillip Hallam-Baker
2010-02-01
12 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-02-01
12 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-02-01
12 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Lars Eggert
2010-02-01
12 Lars Eggert Ballot has been issued by Lars Eggert
2010-02-01
12 Lars Eggert Created "Approve" ballot
2010-02-01
12 Lars Eggert Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-02-18 by Lars Eggert
2010-02-01
12 Lars Eggert State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Lars Eggert
2010-02-01
12 Lars Eggert Last Call was requested by Lars Eggert
2010-02-01
12 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-02-01
12 (System) Last call text was added
2010-02-01
12 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-01-30
12 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-01-30
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-10.txt
2010-01-27
12 Lars Eggert State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Lars Eggert
2010-01-26
12 Lars Eggert State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Lars Eggert
2010-01-26
12 Lars Eggert State Change Notice email list have been change to tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks@tools.ietf.org from tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org
2010-01-26
12 Lars Eggert [Note]: 'Wesley Eddy (Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov) is the document shepherd.' added by Lars Eggert
2010-01-21
12 Cindy Morgan State Changes to Publication Requested from Dead by Cindy Morgan
2010-01-21
12 Cindy Morgan
draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-09
 


  (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
        Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of …
2010-01-21
12 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Wesley Eddy (Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov) is the document shepherd.' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-01-19
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-09.txt
2010-01-19
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-08.txt
2009-12-08
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-07.txt
2009-08-24
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-06.txt
2009-06-04
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-05.txt
2009-04-30
12 (System) Document has expired
2008-10-27
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-04.txt
2008-09-15
12 (System) Document has expired
2008-03-14
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-03.txt
2007-11-08
12 (System) State Changes to Dead from AD is watching by system
2007-11-08
12 (System) Document has expired
2007-05-08
12 (System) State Changes to AD is watching from Dead by system
2007-05-07
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-02.txt
2007-04-28
12 (System) State Changes to Dead from AD is watching by system
2007-04-28
12 (System) Document has expired
2006-10-26
12 (System) State Changes to AD is watching from Dead by system
2006-10-25
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-01.txt
2006-08-31
12 (System) State Changes to Dead from AD is watching by system
2006-08-31
12 (System) Document has expired
2006-03-20
12 Lars Eggert Shepherding AD has been changed to Lars Eggert from Allison Mankin
2006-03-19
12 Lars Eggert Draft Added by Lars Eggert in state AD is watching
2006-02-27
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-00.txt