IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks
RFC 5889

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
03 (System) Notify list changed from autoconf-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
03 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ralph Droms
2010-09-10
03 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 5889' added by Amy Vezza
2010-09-10
03 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2010-09-07
03 (System) RFC published
2010-03-23
03 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2010-03-23
03 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2010-03-23
03 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-03-23
03 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-03-23
03 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2010-03-23
03 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-03-22
03 Jari Arkko State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by Jari Arkko
2010-03-22
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-03.txt
2010-03-15
03 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Jeffrey Hutzelman.
2010-03-12
03 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-03-11
2010-03-11
03 Jari Arkko State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Jari Arkko
2010-03-11
03 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Expand DAD (end of section 6.2).  For consistency, either use "DAD" in both 6.1 and 6.2, or in neither.
---
The first paragraph …
2010-03-11
03 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
The document include RFC 2119 boilerplate but uses lower case requirements words throughout both normatively and non-normatively.

I know this document comes from …
2010-03-11
03 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ralph Droms
2010-03-10
03 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Expand DAD (end of section 6.2).  For consistency, either use "DAD" in both 6.1 and 6.2, or in neither.
---
The first paragraph …
2010-03-10
03 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
The document include RFC 2119 boilerplate but uses lower case requirements words throughout both normatively and non-normatively.

I know this document comes from …
2010-03-10
03 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2010-03-10
03 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2010-03-10
03 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-03-10
03 Pasi Eronen
[Ballot comment]
It seems the content of this document could be summarized "if you want
to use a routing protocol that requires unique addresses (within …
2010-03-10
03 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen
2010-03-10
03 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-03-09
03 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
The Gen-ART Review by Francis Dupont on 2010-02-27 included very
  minor editorial comments.  Please consider them if an update to
  this …
2010-03-09
03 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-03-09
03 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
>                  IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks

  Title doesn't fit the document too …
2010-03-09
03 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-03-08
03 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2010-03-05
03 Jari Arkko State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Jari Arkko
2010-03-05
03 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-03-02
03 Amanda Baber IANA comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this
document to have NO IANA Actions.
2010-02-20
03 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Jeffrey Hutzelman
2010-02-20
03 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Jeffrey Hutzelman
2010-02-19
03 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-02-19
03 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-02-19
03 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-03-11 by Jari Arkko
2010-02-19
03 Jari Arkko State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Jari Arkko
2010-02-19
03 Jari Arkko Last Call was requested by Jari Arkko
2010-02-19
03 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2010-02-19
03 Jari Arkko Ballot has been issued by Jari Arkko
2010-02-19
03 Jari Arkko Created "Approve" ballot
2010-02-19
03 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-02-19
03 (System) Last call text was added
2010-02-19
03 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-02-19
03 Jari Arkko The document looks good. I have sent it forward to IETF Last Call.
2010-02-19
03 Jari Arkko State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Jari Arkko
2010-02-17
03 Amy Vezza
PROTO writeup for draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-02.txt
=================================================

(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the Document
Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the document …
2010-02-17
03 Amy Vezza Draft Added by Amy Vezza in state Publication Requested
2010-02-17
03 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'Ryuji Wakikawa (ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com) is the document shepherd.' added by Amy Vezza
2010-01-26
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-02.txt
2009-12-08
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-01.txt
2009-10-19
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-00.txt