The OAuth 1.0 Protocol
RFC 5849

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
10 (System) Notify list changed from eran@hueniverse.com, stpeter@stpeter.im, romeda@gmail.com, draft-hammer-oauth@ietf.org to romeda@gmail.com, stpeter@stpeter.im
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Cullen Jennings
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2010-04-21
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2010-04-21
10 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 5849' added by Amy Vezza
2010-04-20
10 (System) RFC published
2010-02-17
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2010-02-17
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-02-17
10 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2010-02-17
10 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-02-17
10 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2010-02-17
10 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-02-17
10 Lisa Dusseault State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Lisa Dusseault
2010-02-17
10 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Tim Polk
2010-02-17
10 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to Undefined from Discuss by Tim Polk
2010-02-05
10 (System) New version available: draft-hammer-oauth-10.txt
2010-02-04
09 (System) New version available: draft-hammer-oauth-09.txt
2010-01-14
10 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Cullen Jennings
2010-01-06
10 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Dan Romascanu
2009-12-04
10 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2009-12-03
2009-12-03
10 Lisa Dusseault State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Lisa Dusseault
2009-12-03
10 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2009-12-03
08 (System) New version available: draft-hammer-oauth-08.txt
2009-12-03
10 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
After listening Cullen arguing with Lisa I have to say that I am with Lisa here. It is more important to publish and ...
2009-12-03
10 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2009-12-03
10 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2009-12-03
10 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot comment]
s/header/header field/g - to be more consistent with updated HTTPBis and email specs.
2009-12-03
10 Robert Sparks [Ballot comment]
Support Cullen's discuss.
2009-12-03
10 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2009-12-03
10 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
The practice followed by other WGs in such cases has been to approve such documents as Historical and to hold publication until the ...
2009-12-03
10 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2009-12-02
10 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot discuss]
I don't think we have consensus to publish this. When the WG was formed, it was clear people did not want the IETF ...
2009-12-02
10 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2009-12-02
10 Lars Eggert [Ballot comment]
Is there a reason we're not publishing this as PS?
2009-12-02
10 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2009-12-02
10 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
Section 1, paragraph 5
s/substitute the need/make it unnecessary/

Section 1.1
suggest adding a definition for "credentials" and noting that three classes (client, ...
2009-12-02
10 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4.13 references NIST's initial response to the Wang attack on SHA-1 (specified as
[SHA-COMMENTS], which dates to August 2004), which noted that ...
2009-12-02
10 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
Section 1, paragraph 5
s/substitute the need/make it unnecessary/

Section 1.1
suggest adding a definition for "credentials" and noting that three classes (client, ...
2009-12-02
10 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4.13 references NIST's initial response to the Wang attack on SHA-1 (specified as
[SHA-COMMENTS], which dates to August 2004), which noted that ...
2009-12-02
10 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
Section 1, paragraph 5
s/substitute the need/make it unnecessary/

Section 1.1
suggest adding a definition for "credentials" and noting that three classes (client, ...
2009-12-02
10 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4.13 references NIST's initial response to the Wang attack on SHA-1 (specified as
[SHA-COMMENTS], which dates to August 2004), which noted that ...
2009-12-02
10 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2009-12-02
10 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
Section 1, paragraph 5
s/substitute the need/make it unnecessary/

Section 1.1
suggest adding a definition for "credentials" and noting that three classes (client, ...
2009-12-02
10 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
Section 1, paragraph 5
s/substitute the need/make it unnecessary/

Section 1.1
suggest adding a definition for "credentials" and noting that three classes (client, ...
2009-12-02
10 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
I think it would be better to remove the URI reference [1], and say
  in the introduction:

    The resulting OAuth ...
2009-12-02
10 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
Appendix A talks about "Differences from the Community Edition."
  Is there a stable reference that can be included in this Appendix?
  ...
2009-12-02
10 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2009-12-02
10 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2009-12-02
10 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2009-12-01
10 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2009-12-01
10 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Thank you for bringing this work for publication as an Informational
RFC, and for including the clear statement of origin and intent at ...
2009-12-01
10 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Thank you for bringing this work for publication as an Informational
RFC, and for including the clear statement of origin and intent at ...
2009-11-23
10 Lisa Dusseault Placed on agenda for telechat - 2009-12-03 by Lisa Dusseault
2009-11-23
10 Lisa Dusseault State Change Notice email list have been change to eran@hueniverse.com, stpeter@stpeter.im, romeda@gmail.com, draft-hammer-oauth@tools.ietf.org from eran@hueniverse.com, romeda@gmail.com, draft-hammer-oauth@tools.ietf.org
2009-11-23
10 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Lisa Dusseault
2009-11-23
10 Lisa Dusseault Ballot has been issued by Lisa Dusseault
2009-11-23
10 Lisa Dusseault Created "Approve" ballot
2009-11-23
10 Lisa Dusseault State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Lisa Dusseault
2009-11-23
07 (System) New version available: draft-hammer-oauth-07.txt
2009-11-20
06 (System) New version available: draft-hammer-oauth-06.txt
2009-11-16
10 Lisa Dusseault Genart review by Avshaloum Houri - resulted in new version (-04)
2009-11-16
05 (System) New version available: draft-hammer-oauth-05.txt
2009-11-15
04 (System) New version available: draft-hammer-oauth-04.txt
2009-11-06
10 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2009-10-16
10 Amanda Baber
IANA questions/comments:

We understand that this document does not request any IANA
actions.

Do the protocol values specified in sections 3.1 and 4.2 need a ...
2009-10-09
10 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2009-10-09
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2009-10-09
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Sam Hartman
2009-10-09
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Sam Hartman
2009-10-08
10 Lisa Dusseault Last Call was requested by Lisa Dusseault
2009-10-08
10 Lisa Dusseault State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Lisa Dusseault
2009-10-08
10 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2009-10-08
10 (System) Last call text was added
2009-10-08
10 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2009-09-29
10 Lisa Dusseault Draft Added by Lisa Dusseault in state Publication Requested
2009-09-22
03 (System) New version available: draft-hammer-oauth-03.txt
2009-03-23
02 (System) New version available: draft-hammer-oauth-02.txt
2009-03-09
01 (System) New version available: draft-hammer-oauth-01.txt
2008-11-11
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Early review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Sam Hartman.
2008-10-21
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Sam Hartman
2008-10-21
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Sam Hartman
2008-09-30
00 (System) New version available: draft-hammer-oauth-00.txt