Extensions to OSPF to Support Mobile Ad Hoc Networking
RFC 5820

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2017-05-16
03 (System) Changed document authors from "Abhay Roy" to "Abhay Roy, Madhavi Chandra"
2015-10-14
03 (System) Notify list changed from ospf-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ospf-manet-or@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
03 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
03 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Adrian Farrel
2012-08-22
03 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2010-03-20
03 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan
2010-03-20
03 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'RFC 5820' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-03-18
03 (System) RFC published
2010-01-21
03 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2010-01-21
03 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2010-01-21
03 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2010-01-20
03 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2010-01-15
03 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2010-01-15
03 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-01-15
03 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-01-15
03 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2010-01-15
03 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-01-14
03 Ross Callon State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Ross Callon
2010-01-12
03 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alexey Melnikov has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Alexey Melnikov
2010-01-12
03 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
1.2  Motivation for extending OSPF to support MANETs

  The second motivation is that OSPF is a well understand and widely

s/understand/understood

  ...
2010-01-12
03 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot discuss]
2010-01-12
03 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Tim Polk
2010-01-12
03 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to Undefined from Discuss by Tim Polk
2010-01-12
03 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Adrian Farrel
2010-01-11
03 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-01-11
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ospf-manet-or-03.txt
2009-08-28
03 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2009-08-27
2009-08-27
03 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2009-08-27
03 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
[This is a revised discuss, reflecting changes in the -02 draft].

Ran Canetti provided significant comments in a secdir review that was posted ...
2009-08-26
03 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
Sorry to point this out, but you have an Experimental I-D that is requesting the allocation of two bits in the Router-LSA Router ...
2009-08-26
03 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2009-08-26
03 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
1.2  Motivation for extending OSPF to support MANETs

  The second motivation is that OSPF is a well understand and widely

s/understand/understood

  ...
2009-08-26
03 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
I generally like the document, but I have some minor concerns described below:

Section 3.2.1 says:

  A new I bit is defined ...
2009-08-26
03 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
1.2  Motivation for extending OSPF to support MANETs

  The second motivation is that OSPF is a well understand and widely

s/understand/understood

  ...
2009-08-26
03 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
I generally like the document, but I have some minor concerns described below:

Section 3.2.1 says:

  A new I bit is defined ...
2009-08-26
03 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2009-08-26
03 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2009-08-26
03 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
It's only necessary to cite the reference for a citation to a doc on first mention; reading, e.g., "...modifications to [OSPFv3] to support..." ...
2009-08-26
03 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2009-08-26
03 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2009-08-06
03 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ross Callon has been changed to Yes from No Objection by Ross Callon
2009-08-06
03 Ross Callon State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Ross Callon
2009-08-06
03 Ross Callon Placed on agenda for telechat - 2009-08-27 by Ross Callon
2009-08-06
03 Ross Callon Ballot has been issued by Ross Callon
2009-08-06
03 Ross Callon
PROTO writeup by Acee Lindem:

  1. Have the chairs personally reviewed this version of the Internet
      Draft (ID), and in particular, ...
2009-08-06
03 Ross Callon
PROTO writeup by Acee Lindem:

  1. Have the chairs personally reviewed this version of the Internet
      Draft (ID), and in particular, ...
2009-07-11
03 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2009-07-11
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ospf-manet-or-02.txt
2009-04-08
03 Ross Callon Responsible AD has been changed to Ross Callon from David Ward
2009-03-24
03 David Ward State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by David Ward
2009-01-15
03 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Ran Canetti.
2009-01-15
03 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Cindy Morgan
2009-01-15
03 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
> Note that the active overlapping relays selection algorithm is
> implementation specific, and the above is simply a suggested
> algorithm.  However, ...
2009-01-15
03 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
Ran Canetti provided significant comments in a secdir review that
was posted on 2 January 2009.  There has been no response to this ...
2009-01-15
03 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2009-01-15
03 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
> Note that the active overlapping relays selection algorithm is
> implementation specific, and the above is simply a suggested
> algorithm.  However, ...
2009-01-15
03 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2009-01-15
03 Ross Callon
[Ballot comment]
I think that it is very unfortunate that we can't agree on one single standards track approach for supporting MANET networks with OSPF. ...
2009-01-15
03 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2009-01-15
03 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2009-01-15
03 Jari Arkko [Ballot comment]
> attached to the broadcast network.  Such desginated routers must be

typo
2009-01-15
03 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Mark Townsley
2009-01-15
03 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2009-01-14
03 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen
2009-01-14
03 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2009-01-14
03 Chris Newman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Chris Newman
2009-01-12
03 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
Ben Campbell provided significant comments in a Gen-ART Review that
  was posted on 2008-12-23.  There has been no response to this review. ...
2009-01-12
03 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2008-12-24
03 Amanda Baber
IANA questions/comments:

IANA has questions about draft-ietf-ospf-manet-or-01.txt:

- in Section 3.2 you document "a new SCS TLV" but in the IANA
Considerations section it's expanded ...
2008-12-24
03 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2008-12-13
03 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Ran Canetti
2008-12-13
03 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Ran Canetti
2008-12-10
03 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2008-12-10
03 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2008-12-10
03 David Ward [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for David Ward
2008-12-10
03 David Ward Ballot has been issued by David Ward
2008-12-10
03 David Ward Created "Approve" ballot
2008-12-10
03 David Ward State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by David Ward
2008-12-10
03 David Ward Last Call was requested by David Ward
2008-12-10
03 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2008-12-10
03 (System) Last call text was added
2008-12-10
03 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2008-12-10
03 David Ward Draft Added by David Ward in state AD Evaluation
2008-09-22
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ospf-manet-or-01.txt
2008-08-14
03 (System) Document has expired
2008-02-11
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ospf-manet-or-00.txt