Routing and Addressing in Networks with Global Enterprise Recursion (RANGER)
Draft of message to be sent after approval:
From: The IESG <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: RFC Editor <email@example.com> Cc: The IESG <firstname.lastname@example.org>, <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: Informational RFC to be: draft-templin-ranger-09.txt The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Routing and Addressing in Next-Generation EnteRprises (RANGER)' <draft-templin-ranger-09.txt> as an Informational RFC. The IESG would also like the IRSG or RFC-Editor to review the comments in the datatracker (https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=17773&rfc_flag=0) related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the comment log. The IESG contact person is Jari Arkko. A URL of this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-templin-ranger-09.txt The process for such documents is described at http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html. Thank you, The IESG Secretary
Technical Summary This document describes RANGER, an architecture for reducing routing scalability problems, allowing Working Group Summary This work is not associated with any working group or IETF activity. Document Quality No technical review has been made. Personnel The responsible AD is Jari Arkko. RFC Editor Note The IESG has reviewed this document and believes that the following response from RFC 3932 Section 3 is appropriate: 2. The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in the SHIM6, LISP, and MULTIPATH-TCP WGs, but this does not prevent publishing. (This is a change from a previous recommendation where we believed the below response was appropriate. A new document revision has resolved these concerns and the sponsoring AD will work with the authors to resolve the remaining ones.) 3. The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to the IETF work done in SHIM6, LISP, and MULTIPATH-TCP WGs and recommends not publishing the document at this time. IESG Note The following note from RFC 3932 Section 4 applies: This RFC is not a candidate for any level of Internet Standard. The IETF disclaims any knowledge of the fitness of this RFC for any purpose and notes that the decision to publish is not based on IETF review apart from IESG review for conflict with IETF work. The RFC Editor has chosen to publish this document at its discretion. See RFC 3932 for more information. However, if this document is published as an RFC after the RFC 3932bis and headers and boilerplates documents have been approved, no note is required.