4-Octet AS Specific BGP Extended Community
RFC 5668

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

(Ross Callon) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

Comment (2009-08-11)
No email
send info
Section 5., paragraph 1:
>    All the security considerations for BGP Extended Communities apply
>    here.

  It would be useful to provide a reference.

(Pasi Eronen) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) (was No Record, Discuss) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2009-08-10)
No email
send info
  Please consider the comments from the Gen-ART Review by Ben Campbell
  on 2009-Jun-30.
  
  Are there missing words in Abstract?
  >
  > "...allows to carry 4 octet autonomous system numbers"

  There's no motivational text in the Introduction. A paragraph
  describing (very briefly) why you would want 4 octet extended
  communities might be helpful.

Alexey Melnikov No Objection

(Tim Polk) (was No Record, Discuss) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2009-08-10)
No email
send info
AS should be expanded either in the title or in the Abstract section of the document.

(Robert Sparks) No Objection