Tags for Identifying Languages
RFC 5646

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 23 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2009-06-16)
No email
send info
The reference to 2028 isn't normative. That reference merely describes the IESG.  The reference to 2026 is normative because the process defined here builds on a process defined in 2026.

The reference to 2277 isn't normative.  It's documentation of how a decision was made, not required "to implement" or even to understand langtags.

(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2009-06-16)
No email
send info
I'm very happy to see that Klingon is supported ;-)

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info