Tags for Identifying Languages
RFC 5646
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 23 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) Yes
Yes
( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
send info
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection
No Objection
()
No email
send info
send info
(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection
No Objection
()
No email
send info
send info
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
No Objection
()
No email
send info
send info
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
No Objection
()
No email
send info
send info
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection
No Objection
(2009-06-16)
No email
send info
send info
The reference to 2028 isn't normative. That reference merely describes the IESG. The reference to 2026 is normative because the process defined here builds on a process defined in 2026. The reference to 2277 isn't normative. It's documentation of how a decision was made, not required "to implement" or even to understand langtags.
(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) No Objection
No Objection
()
No email
send info
send info
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection
No Objection
()
No email
send info
send info
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
No Objection
()
No email
send info
send info
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
No Objection
(2009-06-16)
No email
send info
send info
I'm very happy to see that Klingon is supported ;-)
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection
No Objection
()
No email
send info
send info
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
No Objection
()
No email
send info
send info
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection
No Objection
()
No email
send info
send info