Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Call Control - Transfer
RFC 5589

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) (was Discuss) Yes

Yes ()
No email
send info

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Chris Newman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2008-11-05 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
I support Cullen's discuss about multipart wrapping.  While a single-part
multipart/mixed is legal MIME and in theory equivalent to moving the
inner part up a level; in practice the extra wrapper tends to confound
processing agents and UIs.

Because both cases are MIME compliant, this falls under the "be liberal
in what you accept, conservative in what you send" principle.  So it's
bad practice to misbehave when receiving a single-part multipart/mixed,
but it's also bad practice to send it in the first place.  While a "bad
sending practice" example may be useful in specs to help receivers get
more robust, it needs to be identified as a bad practice.

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(David Ward; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2008-11-04)
No email
send info
  Typo at the end of section 11.1:
  >
  > If the gateway supports more than one truck group,
  >
  s/truck/trunk/

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2008-11-04 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
Section 5
s/he Transferee had initiated/the Transferee had initiated/

Section 7.2
s/different that in current/different than in current/

Section 7.5, Figure 9
I believe the Invite associated with dialog4 should be dialog3

Section 7.5, Figure 10
I was confused by the messages associated with dialogs 3 and 4.
I thought the final BYE/200 OK should be associated with dialog4
rather than dialog3.  It looks like dialog3 never terminates; is
a message missing?

Section 7.6
s/to a race conditions/to race conditions/
s/In this, case the call flow/In this case, the call flow/

Section 9, Figure 16
The figure omits dialog numbers.