BGP IPsec Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute
RFC 5566

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

(Ralph Droms) Yes

(Mark Townsley) Yes

(Jari Arkko) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

Comment (2009-01-28 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
Section 2., paragraph 4:
>      - IP-in-IP Tunnel with IPsec Transport Mode: Tunnel Type = 5
>        [RFC4023]

  I think this reference should be to RFC2003 (or at least not to
  RFC4023, because that doesn't talk about IP-in-IP at all.)

(Pasi Eronen) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

(Chris Newman) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2009-01-28 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
It would be helpful to name both the registry "BGP" and the sub-registry
"Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute Tunnel Types" or "Tunnel Encapsulation Attribute Sub-TLVs" to help readers find the relevant IANA registries.

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Tim Polk) (was No Record, Discuss) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection

(David Ward) Recuse