Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Requirements and Protocol Extensions in Support of Global Concurrent Optimization
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
(Ross Callon) Yes
(Ron Bonica) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection
Lars Eggert No Objection
(Pasi Eronen) (was Discuss) No Objection
Charlie Kaufman's SecDir review included several editorial nits that should be fixed (but this can happen during RFC editor processing).
(Russ Housley) No Objection
(Cullen Jennings) No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov) No Objection
(Robert Sparks) No Objection
It's probably worth checking that the update to <svec-list> didn't get out of step with the other -pce- documents (similar to -pce-of- while in genart). I don't think there's a problem, but someone more familiar with the whole set with me should look. If MU and mU are intended to be integers that can only be between 0 and 100, the text would benefit from explicitly stating that. (or is having an MU of 255% ok?)
(Magnus Westerlund) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel) Recuse
I am currently still working group chair for PCE. I also contributed significantly to this I-D.