Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Requirements and Protocol Extensions in Support of Global Concurrent Optimization
RFC 5557

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.

(Ross Callon) Yes

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

(Pasi Eronen) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2009-04-07)
No email
send info
Charlie Kaufman's SecDir review included several editorial nits that
should be fixed (but this can happen during RFC editor processing).

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

Alexey Melnikov No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

Comment (2009-04-07)
No email
send info
It's probably worth checking that the update to <svec-list> didn't get out of step with the other -pce- documents (similar to -pce-of- while in genart). I don't think there's a problem, but someone more familiar with the whole set with me should look.

If MU and mU are intended to be integers that can only be between 0 and 100, the text would benefit from explicitly stating that. (or is having an MU of 255% ok?)

Magnus Westerlund No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) Recuse

Comment (2009-04-05)
No email
send info
I am currently still working group chair for PCE. I also contributed significantly to this I-D.