Network Mobility Route Optimization Requirements for Operational Use in Aeronautics and Space Exploration Mobile Networks
RFC 5522

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()
No email
send info

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2009-08-26)
No email
send info
I found this to be a particularly well-written document. I wish half the requirements documents I read were half as good.

(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2009-08-25)
No email
send info
  Please consider the comments in the Gen-ART Review by Vijay Gurbani
  posted on 20-Aug-2009:

  1) What is the "Gatelink system"?  There are at least two
     instances of it in the draft.  Any reference or a short
     sentence describing this would help the reader not
     verbose in this particular domain.

  2) Missing closing bracket ')' in Section 2.1.1, third paragraph,
     third line; i.e., should be "... in Appendix A.)"

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) Abstain

Abstain (2009-08-27)
No email
send info
I don't believe these requirements adequately cover the requirements for ATS data. For example, "Req3 - Latency" is a solution to mitigate latency, not an actual requirement that bounds latency.

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) (was No Objection) No Record

No Record ()
No email
send info