Performance Analysis of Inter-Domain Path Computation Methodologies
RFC 5468
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
(Ross Callon) Yes
(David Ward) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
(Ron Bonica) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection
(Pasi Eronen) (was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2009-01-08)
No email
send info
send info
The document should very early (in abstract or introduction) say that much of the interesting content (results of the simulation) is only in the PDF version, not the ASCII version. (Currently, the reader discovers he/she is reading the wrong version only in Section 5.) From idnits: == The document doesn't use any RFC 2119 keywords, yet seems to have RFC 2119 boilerplate text. == Unused Reference: 'I-D.ietf-ccamp-inter-domain-rsvp-te' is defined on line 427, but no explicit reference was found in the text == Unused Reference: 'I-D.ietf-ccamp-lsp-stitching' is defined on line 434, but no explicit reference was found in the text == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-ccamp-inter-domain-pd-path-comp has been published as RFC 5152 == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-ccamp-inter-domain-rsvp-te has been published as RFC 5151 == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-stitching has been published as RFC 5150 -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 3784 (Obsoleted by RFC 5305)
(Russ Housley) No Objection
Comment (2009-01-03)
No email
send info
send info
A few nits were notd by Spencer Dawkins during his Gen-ART Review: s/Virutal/Virtual/ s/Eventhough/Even though/