The IMAP NOTIFY Extension
RFC 5465

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

(Chris Newman; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()
No email
send info

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(David Ward; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2008-12-02)
No email
send info
  Based on the discussion that followed the Gen-ART Review by
  Brian Carpenter, I expected to see a forward reference added to
  the 'Overview and rationale' section to resolve this comment:
  >
  > I was slightly confused about the interaction between IDLE and NOTIFY
  > while reading '2.  Overview and rationale'. It was only when I reached
  > '4.  Interaction with the IDLE Command' that I understood this. It
  > would help if section 2 included a forward reference to section 4, like
  >  The interaction between IDLE and NOTIFY is described in section 4.
  > This is not a big deal, though.

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info