The IMAP NOTIFY Extension
RFC 5465

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

(Chris Newman) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

(Pasi Eronen) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2008-12-02)
No email
send info
  Based on the discussion that followed the Gen-ART Review by
  Brian Carpenter, I expected to see a forward reference added to
  the 'Overview and rationale' section to resolve this comment:
  >
  > I was slightly confused about the interaction between IDLE and NOTIFY
  > while reading '2.  Overview and rationale'. It was only when I reached
  > '4.  Interaction with the IDLE Command' that I understood this. It
  > would help if section 2 included a forward reference to section 4, like
  >  The interaction between IDLE and NOTIFY is described in section 4.
  > This is not a big deal, though.

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

(Jon Peterson) No Objection

(Tim Polk) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Mark Townsley) No Objection

(David Ward) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection