[Ballot comment]
The security considerations could be more helpful to the reader if the appropriate
references were listed for each bullet item, rather than grouped together after the
list.  A motivated reader might spend a lot of time looking for the right references.
Given the goals of this document, though, these changes are not essential.

(1.a) Document Shepherd: Alexey Melnikov, alexey.melnikov@isode.com, personally reviewed this document. This document is ready for publication.

(1.b) Work group review: The lemonade work group provided review of this document.

(1.c) Further review required: This document does not need further specialized review, as it has received review by many members of the LEMONADE WG, OMA MEM WG, and IMAP community.

(1.d.i) Document Shepherd Comfort Level: High

(1.d.ii) Document Useful and Needed: Yes

(1.d.iii) IPR Disclosures: None known

(1.e) WG Consensus: Minor edit issues, but no substantive issues. All edits addressed in this version.

(1.f) There are no members with objections or concerns. There are no threats of appeal or process issues.

(1.g) ID-nits: Check and verified with idnits 2.08.10

(1.h) References: All are Informative and all are up-to-date.

(1.i) IANA Considerations: None

(1.j) ABNF: No ABNF in the document

(1.k) Document Announcement:

Technical Summary

This document specifies the architecture for mobile email, as described by the OMA, using Internet Mail protocols. This architecture is the basis of the work of the LEMONADE WG and is a guideline for the LEMONADE Profile.


Working Group Summary

There is consensus in the WG to publish this document.

Document Quality

Virtually all members of the Lemonade WG have reviewed the document.


Alexey Melnikov shepherds this document, has reviewed this document, and believes that this version is ready for forwarding to the IESG for publication.