Guidelines for Using the Privacy Mechanism for SIP
RFC 5379

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

(Jon Peterson) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

Comment (2008-10-07)
No email
send info
Nit: Wouldn't the RFC3932 Section 4 clause 1 text be a bit more appropriate for an IESG Note, given that the draft has been discussed in SIP?

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

(Chris Newman) No Objection

(Tim Polk) No Objection

(David Ward) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection

Comment (2008-10-09)
No email
send info
Shouldn't our decision on response 2: be included in the RFC-editor  Note section: 

   2. The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
      <X>, but this does not prevent publishing.