Joint Working Team (JWT) Report on MPLS Architectural Considerations for a Transport Profile
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.
(Jari Arkko) Yes
(Ron Bonica) Yes
(Ross Callon) (was Discuss) Yes
(Russ Housley) Yes
Section 1 says: "... a set of power point slides ..."; I suggest that "power point" be dropped. These slides are available only in PDF, so their original format is not important. Section 2: s/fulfil/fulfill/ Section 2: The final sentence of the section contains a missing reference. Please provide it. Section 5: s/case by case basis/case-by-case basis/ Section 7: The first sentence is missing a period.
(Chris Newman) Yes
(Tim Polk) Yes
[Before my comments, I'd like to say thanks to everyone in the IETF (and ITU-T) that worked on this problem for all the hard work you did. You guys really took one for the team, and I personally appreciate it!] A couple of nits: Abstract s/recommended of Option 1/recommended of Option 1/ Section 1 paragraph 4 s/this was supported/supported/
(Mark Townsley) Yes
Old: "Label for You" (LFU). New: "Label For yoU" (LFU).