Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) over the Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP)
RFC 5238

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

(Lars Eggert) Yes

(Pasi Eronen) Yes

Magnus Westerlund Yes

Comment (2008-04-24)
No email
send info
The abstract and introduction may be interpreted as DTLS providing security mechanisms to the DCCP protocol, rather to the carried data payloads. It would be good if one clarified this by improving the wording in these two sections.

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2008-04-18)
No email
send info
  At the beginning of section 3:
  >  Multiple DTLS records MAY be sent in one DCCP-Data packet, as long
  > as the resulting packet is within the Path Maximum Transfer Unit
  > (PMTU) currently in force for normal data packets, if the Don't
  > Fragment (DF) bit is being used, or within the current DCCP maximum
  > packet size if the DF bit is not being used (see section 3.5 for
  > more information on PMTU Discovery). 
  This needs to be split into two cases: IPv4 (in which case the DF bit
  exists and may or may not be set) and IPv6 (where DF doesn't exist).

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

(Chris Newman) No Objection

(Tim Polk) No Objection

(Mark Townsley) No Objection

(David Ward) No Objection