LoST: A Location-to-Service Translation Protocol
RFC 5222

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
10 (System) Notify list changed from ecrit-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ecrit-lost@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Cullen Jennings
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Lisa Dusseault
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Pasi Eronen
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2008-08-05
10 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan
2008-08-05
10 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'RFC 5222' added by Cindy Morgan
2008-08-05
10 (System) RFC published
2008-06-12
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2008-06-11
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2008-06-11
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2008-06-11
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2008-06-10
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2008-06-10
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2008-06-10
10 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2008-06-10
10 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2008-06-10
10 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2008-06-10
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza
2008-06-05
10 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Cullen Jennings
2008-05-28
10 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pasi Eronen has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Pasi Eronen
2008-05-28
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-10.txt
2008-04-22
10 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot discuss]
I am updating this to focus this discuss down to the part that still seem contentious and clarify the discuss.

Shape Matching Issue: ...
2008-04-22
10 Cullen Jennings
Had call with Hannes and Andy last week. Meant with Hannes, Henning, Richard Barnes and Brian Rosen today. Seems to be agreement their is an ...
2008-04-04
10 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Tim Polk
2008-04-04
10 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to Undefined from Discuss by Tim Polk
2008-03-28
10 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lisa Dusseault has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Lisa Dusseault
2008-03-28
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-09.txt
2008-03-28
10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2008-03-28
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-08.txt
2008-03-19
10 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot discuss]
I am updating this to focus this discuss down to the part that still seem contentious and clarify the discuss.

Shape Matching Issue: ...
2008-03-19
10 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot discuss]
I am updating this to focus this discuss down to the part that still seem contentious and clarify the discuss.

Shape Matching Issue: ...
2008-03-19
10 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot discuss]
I am updating this to focus this discuss down to the part that still seem contentious and clarify the discuss.

Shape Matching Issue: ...
2008-03-14
10 Pasi Eronen
[Ballot discuss]
In the beginning, Leslie and Andrew created S-NAPTR; and the IESG saw
the draft, that it was good; and RFC 3958 was given ...
2008-03-14
10 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen
2008-03-06
10 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot discuss]
Section 5.6, 2nd para, I I think "omit" should be "emit"

There is an ongoing discussion about if the example in section 8.2.1 ...
2008-03-06
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2008-03-06
10 Sam Hartman
[Ballot discuss]
Section 18 claims that authorization is not generally required.  I
agree that LOST servers do not typically need to authorize clients,
but authentication ...
2008-03-05
10 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2008-03-05
10 Jari Arkko [Ballot comment]
> <path>elelment,

Typo.
2008-03-05
10 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2008-03-05
10 Sam Hartman
[Ballot comment]
I'd really like to see some thought applied to RFC 3205 and this
protocol.  Especially given that the security requirements do not seem ...
2008-03-05
10 Sam Hartman
[Ballot discuss]
Section 18 claims that authorization is not generally required.  I
agree that LOST servers do not typically need to authorize clients,
but authentication ...
2008-03-05
10 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Sam Hartman
2008-03-04
10 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
1. second paragraph of Section 1 - PIDF-LO is duplicated

2. second paragraph of Section 1 - please explain what are "2-1-1" and ...
2008-03-04
10 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2008-03-04
10 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
1. second paragraph of Section 1 - PIDF-LO is duplicated

2. second paragraph of Section 1 - please explain what are "2-1-1" and ...
2008-03-04
10 (System) State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation - Defer by system
2008-03-03
10 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
The introduction suggests that LoST may be appropriate for non-emergency services
as well, but does not revisit that notion anywhere else in the ...
2008-03-03
10 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Tim Polk
2008-03-02
10 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot discuss]
Section 5.6, 2nd para, I I think "omit" should be "emit"

There is an ongoing discussion about if the example in section 8.2.1 ...
2008-03-02
10 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2008-02-22
10 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2008-02-21
2008-02-20
10 Cullen Jennings State Changes to IESG Evaluation - Defer from Waiting for Writeup::AD Followup by Cullen Jennings
2008-02-20
10 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2008-02-20
10 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Mark Townsley
2008-02-20
10 Lisa Dusseault
[Ballot discuss]
1. Redirects

The section on redirect (13.3) is shockingly short.  Are redirects permanent or temporary?  Should other servers change their listings when seeing ...
2008-02-20
10 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2008-02-20
10 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2008-02-20
10 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2008-02-20
10 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot comment]
Abtract:
Usage of "PSAP" acronym. Please write it out.
2008-02-20
10 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2008-02-19
10 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
Based on the Gen-ART Review by Ben Campbell.

  In Section 12, first paragraph, it says: "To achieve interoperability,
  this document defines ...
2008-02-19
10 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
As pointed out by Ben Campbell in his Gen-ART Review, these things
  should probably be reworded as normative statements:
 
  - ...
2008-02-19
10 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
In Section 12, first paragraph, it says: "To achieve interoperability,
  this document defines two mandatory-to-implement baseline location
  profiles to define the ...
2008-02-19
10 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2008-02-15
10 (System) Ballot has been issued
2008-02-15
10 Amy Vezza [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Amy Vezza
2008-02-15
10 Amy Vezza Created "Approve" ballot
2008-02-15
10 Amy Vezza Placed on agenda for telechat - 2008-02-21 by Amy Vezza
2008-02-07
10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2008-02-07
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-07.txt
2007-12-13
10 Jon Peterson State Changes to Waiting for Writeup::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for Writeup by Jon Peterson
2007-11-29
10 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2007-11-20
10 Amanda Baber
IANA Last Call comments:

IANA has questions.

First, the Schema registration is incorrect (it uses the wrong URI).
Second, do you need a registry for ...
2007-11-16
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Joseph Salowey
2007-11-16
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Joseph Salowey
2007-11-15
10 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2007-11-15
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2007-11-15
10 Jon Peterson Last Call was requested by Jon Peterson
2007-11-15
10 Jon Peterson State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Jon Peterson
2007-11-15
10 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2007-11-15
10 (System) Last call text was added
2007-11-15
10 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2007-11-07
10 Jon Peterson State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Jon Peterson
2007-09-27
10 Dinara Suleymanova
PROTO Write-up

(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
document and, in particular, ...
2007-09-27
10 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova in state Publication Requested
2007-08-13
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-06.txt
2007-03-07
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-05.txt
2007-02-13
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-04.txt
2007-01-18
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-03.txt
2006-10-24
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-02.txt
2006-09-06
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-01.txt
2006-06-20
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-00.txt