State of Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Communication across Network Address Translators (NATs)
RFC 5128

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

(Jari Arkko) Yes

Magnus Westerlund Yes

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) (was No Record, No Objection) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

Comment (2007-10-27 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 11:
> Table of Contents

  Has no page numbers?

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Cullen Jennings) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2007-10-31)
No email
send info
NITS: 

Might want to define SOHO

TODO - check meaning lie 

I don't think it is correct to say Skype uses central public server for registration (at least the type of registration you mean here)

In section 5.2 , mention audio conferencing. I think this is a bad example in that it often was media relay. Did you mean to just say RTP audio sessions?

Other than I am author, any particular reason not to reference draft-jennings-behave-test-results? If there is a problem with that work, it would be nice to know about it. I note that instead you are using a link that says at the top of the page "This page, the NAT servers, and the results database are no longer being actively maintained. "

(Chris Newman) No Objection

Comment (2007-11-01 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
Please fix the grammar in the "Document Quality" section of the IESG
write-up.

(Tim Polk) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

Comment (2007-11-01 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
RFC3489 is used as an Informative Reference for [STUN]. Would not it be better to use http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-behave-rfc3489bis-11.txt instead?

(David Ward) (was Discuss) No Objection