Considerations in Validating the Path in BGP
RFC 5123

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.

(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) (was Yes) No Objection

No Objection (2006-02-14 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
Proposed text of response to the RFC Editor:

 After consultation with the RPSEC WG, the IESG thinks that this work is 
 related to IETF work done in WG RPSEC, but this does not prevent publishing.

 The IESG also recommends that a standard IESG note described in RFC 3932,
 section 4, case 2, is inserted in the document before publication.

(Brian Carpenter; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info