IAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process: Revision of the Nominating and Recall Committees Timeline
RFC 5078

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.

(Jari Arkko) Yes

Comment (2007-07-19 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
The document does not mention that if you start early, then there's less experience with the current members of the IESG/IAB. In particular, if someone is on his or hers first 1 year-term, then starting in September means that the IETF community has experience from one IETF meeting with
this particular person (the summer meeting). So moving earlier is not
always only a positive thing, and perhaps the document could say
something about this. But I nevertheless fully support the document's
suggested timelines, which are IMHO a good balance between the different
pressures.

Nits:

s/random slection/random selection/
s/missed oppotunity/missed opportunity/

(Ron Bonica) Yes

(Ross Callon) Yes

(Lars Eggert) Yes

Comment (2007-07-16 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
Section 10., paragraph 5:
>    Note - Does the ISOC portion of the timeline exist in a referenceable
>    form?

  Has this been resolved?

(Russ Housley) Yes

(Cullen Jennings) Yes

(Chris Newman) Yes

(Mark Townsley) Yes

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Tim Polk) No Objection

Comment (2007-07-17 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
In section 4., the phrase "she needs to have a shortlist" is currently correct, but I would suggest
something gender neutral...

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(David Ward) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2007-07-17 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
run-on sentence:

Section 6:

" If a future normative revision to
   [RFC3777] allowed someone else - perhaps the ISOC President - to
   issue the call for volunteers, this could be issued while the NomCom
   chair is still being selected, and the new chair could begin work by
   announcing the date of random selection, instead of waiting for the
   volunteers to volunteer for 30 days.
"

In general there are too many "," (commas) in the doc for proper English. Needs another spin to pick nits. Just and example from Section 3:

"The NomCom volunteers don't have a chance to conduct interviews
       with the community, or with nominees, until the third IETF,
       during the height of the NomCom effort.  If the NomCom effort
       took place before the Third IETF, the NomCom could work on
       difficult nominations, and to meet with nominees under
       consideration, face to face."

Magnus Westerlund (was Discuss) No Objection