DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)
RFC 5074

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

(Russ Housley) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

Comment (2007-08-22 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
I agree with the Discusses and Comments.

(Ron Bonica) (was Discuss, No Record, Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2007-07-30)
No email
send info
Supporting Russ's discuss. IANA should not maintain this registry.

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

(Sam Hartman) No Objection

Comment (2007-08-22 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
I support publication of the base DLV spec.
I have concerns about dlv-iana.

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

(Chris Newman) No Objection

(Tim Polk) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2007-09-02)
No email
send info
This issue was raised by Olaf Gudmundsson from the DNS Directorate, wrt. draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv:

 there is one issue that keeps nagging at me as a BAD thing.
I'm talking about the "aggressive negative caching behavior".
I think the same effect can be accomplished without any protocol change by allowing the validating resolvers to have a copy of the DLV zone, in that case the normal name lookup algorithm is used not some special resolver addition.
This will also reduce the lookup times, but the operational aspects of this are many and require some thought.

(David Ward) (was Abstain) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) Abstain