Direct Data Placement Protocol (DDP) / Remote Direct Memory Access Protocol (RDMAP) Security
RFC 5042

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sam Hartman
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2007-11-05
10 (System) This was part of a ballot set with: draft-ietf-rddp-applicability
2007-11-05
10 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 5045, RFC 5042' added by Amy Vezza
2007-11-05
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2007-11-05
10 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 5045' added by Amy Vezza
2007-10-31
10 (System) RFC published
2006-11-08
10 (System) Request for Early review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Derek Atkins.
2006-11-08
10 (System) Request for Early review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Patrick Cain.
2006-08-01
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2006-07-26
10 Michael Lee IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2006-07-26
10 Michael Lee IESG has approved the document
2006-07-26
10 Michael Lee Closed "Approve" ballot
2006-07-25
10 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sam Hartman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Sam Hartman
2006-06-28
10 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2006-06-28
10 Russ Housley [Ballot discuss]
draft-ietf-rddp-applicability-07:

  The discussion in section 9.3 should consider DTLS (RFC 4347).
2006-06-23
10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2006-06-23
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rddp-security-10.txt
2006-06-04
10 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter
2006-05-26
10 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2006-05-25
2006-05-25
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2006-05-25
10 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Lisa Dusseault by Lisa Dusseault
2006-05-25
10 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
Nits on the applicability document

s/existince/existence/
s/imbedded/embedded/
s/signifigant/significant/

Normative references that are not used:

  - Unused Reference: [1] is defined on line …
2006-05-25
10 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko by Jari Arkko
2006-05-25
10 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mark Townsley by Mark Townsley
2006-05-25
10 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2006-05-25
10 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2006-05-24
10 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ross Callon by Ross Callon
2006-05-24
10 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2006-05-24
10 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Cullen Jennings by Cullen Jennings
2006-05-24
10 Yoshiko Fong IANA Comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO
IANA Actions.
2006-05-24
10 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
Both documents depend on several normative references from the rddp wg. Specifically the Internet-Drafts defining DDP and RDMAP did not yet go through …
2006-05-24
10 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Dan Romascanu by Dan Romascanu
2006-05-23
10 Sam Hartman
[Ballot discuss]
The following text in section 2 of the security draft is not
referenced in the normative requirements in section 12:

>  In any …
2006-05-23
10 Sam Hartman
[Ballot comment]
The discussion of TLS in section 5.4 of the security draft does not
make sense to me.  How is the record length of …
2006-05-23
10 Sam Hartman
[Ballot comment]
The discussion of TLS in section 5.4 does not make sense to me.  How
is the record length of 2**14 bytes any worse …
2006-05-23
10 Sam Hartman
[Ballot discuss]
The following text in section 2 is not referenced in the normative
requirements in section 12:

>  In any event, it is the …
2006-05-23
10 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman
2006-05-23
10 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Lars Eggert
2006-05-22
10 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
draft-ietf-rddp-security-09:

  The discussion in section 5.4.2 should consider DTLS (RFC 4347).
  It might be best handled as a separate section.

  …
2006-05-22
10 Russ Housley [Ballot comment]
s/IPSEC/IPsec/

  In draft-ietf-rddp-applicability-06, please spell out the first use of
  ULP (Upper Layer Protocol).
2006-05-22
10 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
draft-ietf-rddp-security-09:

  The discussion in section 5.4.2 should consider DTLS (RFC 4347).
  It might be best handled as a separate section.

  …
2006-05-22
10 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2006-05-22
10 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
These are all about draft-ietf-rddp-applicability-06.txt.

Overall:
Cites RFC2119, doesn't have the boilerplate text, uses the terms
in only a few subsections. Does this …
2006-05-22
10 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Lars Eggert by Lars Eggert
2006-05-22
10 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Magnus Westerlund by Magnus Westerlund
2006-05-18
10 Jon Peterson Placed on agenda for telechat - 2006-05-25 by Jon Peterson
2006-05-18
10 Jon Peterson State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Jon Peterson
2006-05-18
10 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jon Peterson
2006-05-18
10 Jon Peterson Ballot has been issued by Jon Peterson
2006-05-18
10 Jon Peterson Created "Approve" ballot
2006-05-05
10 Lars Eggert Jon Peterson will process this set of documents.
2006-05-05
10 Lars Eggert Shepherding AD has been changed to Jon Peterson from Lars Eggert
2006-05-02
10 Lars Eggert Shepherding AD has been changed to Lars Eggert from Jon Peterson
2006-05-01
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rddp-security-09.txt
2006-04-19
10 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2006-04-05
10 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2006-04-05
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2006-04-05
10 Jon Peterson Last Call was requested by Jon Peterson
2006-04-05
10 Jon Peterson State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Jon Peterson
2006-04-05
10 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2006-04-05
10 (System) Last call text was added
2006-04-05
10 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2006-03-10
10 Jon Peterson [Note]: 'PROTO Sherpherd: David Black (Black_David@emc.com)' added by Jon Peterson
2006-03-10
10 Jon Peterson
PROTO writeup:
                  DDP/RDMAP Security
                  draft-ietf-rddp-security-07.txt

Requested Publication …
2006-03-09
10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2006-03-09
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rddp-security-08.txt
2006-02-06
10 Jon Peterson State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Jon Peterson
2005-10-12
10 Jon Peterson State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Jon Peterson
2005-10-12
10 Jon Peterson Merged with draft-ietf-rddp-ddp by Jon Peterson
2005-08-04
10 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova in state Publication Requested
2005-04-12
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rddp-security-07.txt
2004-12-27
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rddp-security-06.txt
2004-12-17
(System) Posted related IPR disclosure: Microsoft Corporation 's statement about IPR claimed in draft-ietf-rddp-security-05.txt
2004-08-27
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rddp-security-05.txt
2004-08-23
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rddp-security-04.txt
2004-08-09
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rddp-security-03.txt
2004-07-19
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rddp-security-02.txt
2003-10-22
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rddp-security-01.txt
2003-10-22
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rddp-security-00.txt