Specifying New Congestion Control Algorithms
RFC 5033

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert Yes

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Chris Newman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2007-05-22 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
When reading this, it wondered if the 2914 reference should be normative. I don't care one way or the other but might be worth 10 seconds of thought.

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2007-05-17 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
I am not sure why section 5 (Conclusions) is needed, it looks like a leftover from previous versions of the document. Also why is it using the term 'researchers' instead of 'authors of congestion control schemes' for example?

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) (was Discuss, No Record, Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2007-06-06)
No email
send info
I believe the document is a bit weak in its choice of words in some areas for a BCP (e.g., rather than "we would hope the guidelines in this document inform" simply state "the guidelines in this document inform").

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2007-05-22)
No email
send info
  The Gen-ART Review by Gonzalo Camarillo uncovered the following
  IDNits tool complaints:

  ** There are 2 instances of too long lines in the document, the
     longest one being 1 character in excess of 72.

  ** There are 70 instances of lines with control characters in the
     document.

(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2007-05-22 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
If this is not a binding guideline, I don't understand why we are publishing as a BCP rather than informational.

However the text is good so I'm not going to hold a discuss.

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info