The Dublin Core Metadata Element Set
RFC 5013

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

(Lisa Dusseault) Yes

(Chris Newman) (was No Objection) Yes

Comment (2007-05-10)
No email
send info
The inclusion of a language attribute makes this comply with section 4 of
RFC 2277 / BCP 18.  Section 3 of RFC 2277 / BCP 18 doesn't apply because
this is too high level to discuss charsets (it describes meta information
without describing the encoding of that information when it is applied
to a specific protocol context).  When this is mapped to vanilla XML
or XHTML, for example, it would need to comply with the XML charset
requirements (support for both UTF-8 and UTF-16).  When used in an IETF
protocol, we would expect support for UTF-8.

It also uses an international date format, although the syntax is
somewhat more liberal than RFC 3339.  The more liberal syntax is
suitable for such a high level document as the accuracy necessary for
RFC 3339 format may not be available in this context.

I conclude this complies with our internationalization and date-time

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

Comment (2007-05-07)
No email
send info
agree with Russ' comment - the wording should be changed

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2007-05-07)
No email
send info
  This document is intended for publication as an Informational RFC. It
  is not an IETF standards-track document.  I wonder if we are going to
  confuse the reader by using the word "standard" when this document
  refers to itself.  
  - Section 2: The fifteen element "Dublin Core" described in this
    standard ...
  - Section 3: The elements described in this standard ...
  - Section 3: ... implementation detail is outside the scope of this
  - Appendix A:  This appendix is not part of the standard.
  - Appendix B:  This appendix is not part of the standard.

(David Kessens) No Objection

(Tim Polk) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(David Ward) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection

(Cullen Jennings) (was Discuss) No Record